Search for: "A. A. READ, Appeals Examiner"
Results 421 - 440
of 11,610
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Nov 2023, 2:15 am
Read the ICO’s statement in response to the Court of Appeal’s judgment here. [read post]
26 Nov 2023, 6:52 am
It examines the market in aggregate and segmented into software and services, providing insights into the Compound Annual Growth Rates (CAGR) and shifts in market shares. [read post]
24 Nov 2023, 12:19 am
Anyhow, if 90% of the decisions of the opposition division and the examining divisions are apparently regarded by the Boards of Appeal as being wrong, that doesn’t speak for the quality of these instances. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 8:12 am
The Resolution is worth a careful read. [read post]
23 Nov 2023, 1:42 am
The present decision examines these key determinants in the context of biochemical substances. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 4:00 pm
Read up on your state and local raffle laws and structure the promotion accordingly. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 1:41 pm
The Board will still need to examine whether identical third-party registrations show the commercial weakness of the Opposer’s mark, but they will not disregard them simply because the Applicant did not provide proof of use. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:18 am
He conceded under cross-examination that he had no knowledge of its market value. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 5:01 am
Citing ONY, the Third Circuit examined the content of the publication, the verifiability of the assertions, and the context in which they were written. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 3:55 am
Read comments and post your comment here. [read post]
20 Nov 2023, 2:36 am
Read the ICO’s statement here. [read post]
19 Nov 2023, 1:16 pm
(I suspect an appeal of this decision would be… difficult.) [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
[xvii] The aim of this analysis is to examine the potential impact of the dumped imports on domestic producers. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 10:05 am
[xvii] The aim of this analysis is to examine the potential impact of the dumped imports on domestic producers. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 1:26 pm
The examining attorney refused registration under 15 U.S.C. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Insurers underwrite the policies by examining the case and the most likely outcomes. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 9:11 am
In doing so, CMS proposes to modify and strengthen the current SSBCI disclaimer requirements MA organizations must use whenever SSBCI are mentioned by requiring that the SSBCI disclaimer: (1) list the relevant chronic condition(s) the enrollee must have to be eligible for the SSBCI offered by the MA organization; (2) convey that, even if the enrollee has a listed chronic condition, the enrollee may not receive the benefit because other coverage criteria also apply; (3) be in specific font and… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Note that I will not read the parties’ offers until the hearing has concluded. 3. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
She appealed. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 10:10 am
Continue reading [read post]
