Search for: "ACE LTD" Results 421 - 440 of 768
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Oct 2012, 8:20 am by Bryan Heaney
He accepts that if regulations are laid his case might not fall within them but claims to have standing under the new approach to Scottish public law title and interest set out in AXA General Insurance Ltd v HM Advocate [2011] UKSC 46, [2012] 1 AC 868, 2011 SLT 106. [read post]
26 Sep 2012, 5:39 am by Rob Robinson
Second Circuit Sacks Email Notice of Post-Transaction Terms – http://bit.ly/Pn6RNn (Jeff Neuburger) Iran Announces Plan To Launch Domestic Internet By March 2013 (And To Block Google Today) – http://tcrn.ch/Qctas2 (Anthony Ha) Legal Project Management 2.0: The Pressure to Perform and the Mandate to Deliver - http://bit.ly/Pn6D8V (Pam Woldow) NLRB Invalidates Costco’s Social Media Policy - http://bit.ly/P5U2a3 (Hunton Williams) Personal Data Overhaul… [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 5:41 am by Brandon Kain
The UK Supreme Court has granted permission to appeal in a case that raises important issues regarding the legal doctrine of “piercing the corporate veil”. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
Further, in Lane v Esdaile [1891] AC 210, it had been held that a requirement to obtain permission to appeal impliedly excluded an appeal against a refusal of permission. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 7:23 am by J
Further, in Lane v Esdaile [1891] AC 210, it had been held that a requirement to obtain permission to appeal impliedly excluded an appeal against a refusal of permission. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:29 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Telefonica O2 UK Ltd & Ors v British Telecommunications Plc & Anor [2012] EWCA Civ 1002 (25 July 2012) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) AC v Farooq & Anor [2012] EWHC 1484 (QB) (30 July 2012) High Court (Chancery Division) Davies v AIB Group (UK) Plc [2012] EWHC 2178 (Ch) (27 July 2012) Hughes & Ors v Bourne & Ors [2012] EWHC 2232 (Ch) (27 July 2012) High Court (Administrative Court) Konuksever v The Government… [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 8:33 am by Stikeman Elliott LLP
Raymond McDougall - In late June, Barkerville Gold Mines Ltd. announced major estimates of resources and “geological potential”. [read post]
6 Jul 2012, 11:33 am by Rosalind English
Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 at 381; and see AXA General Insurance Ltd at [32] (Lord Hope DPSC) and [131] (Lord Reed JSC). [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 1:33 am by Daniel West
On 14 June 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in The Rugby Football Union v Viagogo Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 1585, a case likely to clarify the threshold for obtaining Norwich Pharmacal disclosure orders and have wide-ranging implications for those seeking to curtail the resale of events tickets on the black market. [read post]
1 Jul 2012, 10:10 am by Howard Knopf
The relevant factors to be considered include:a. the quality and quantity of the material taken;b. the extent to which the respondent’s use adversely affects the applicant’s activities and diminishes the value of the applicant’s copyright;c. whether the material taken is the proper subject-matter of a copyright;d. whether the respondent intentionally appropriated the applicant’s work to save time and effort; ande. whether the material taken is used in the same or a similar… [read post]
17 Jun 2012, 7:10 pm by Barry Eagar
Du Cros Ltd. (1913) AC 624 at 634, 635) Lord Parker of Waddington having remarked upon the difficulty of finding the right criterion by which to determine whether a proposed mark is or is not "adapted to distinguish" the applicant's goods defined the crucial question practically as I have stated it, and added two sentences which have often been quoted but to which it is well to return for an understanding of the problem in a case such as the present. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 5:13 am by Russell Beck
Massachusetts: Several recent cases in Massachusetts are worth noting: Ace Precision, Inc. v. [read post]