Search for: "AMERICAN EMPLOYERS v. Department of Labor" Results 421 - 440 of 899
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization… [read post]
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or recognized employee organization… [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 3:00 am by William Ford
We will advance a modern labor market that aligns the skills of our workforce to the needs of our employers, keeping American businesses competitive and giving American workers clear pathways to quality jobs over the course of their lives. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 6:15 pm
The federal government’s legal firepower is vastly greater: The Department of Justice has 11,169 lawyers, including 223 at the FBI; the Department of Homeland Security has 2,197 lawyers; and the Departments of Education, Defense, Health and Human Services, and Labor have 5,539 lawyers among them. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 4:00 am
Pyett, No. 07-581Enforceability of collectively bargained arbitration clauseo April 1, 2009 decision hereo SCOTUS docket hereo SCOTUSWIKI hereo Noted here: Workforce Management; Jackson Lewis; Fisher & Phillips, McGuire Woods; NY Times; California Labor & Employment Law Blog; Employer Law Report; Littler; Buchanan, Ingersoll and Rooney; HR Lawyer's Blog; SCOTUSblog (opinion analysis); Proskauer Rose; Fox RothschildArgued -… [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 5:42 am by Jon Hyman
North American Stainless and rejects associational retaliation claims. [read post]
22 May 2015, 1:28 am by Arkady Bukh
”When word about von Bolschwing’s involvement reached the US Justice Department in 1981, the Justice Department wanted to deport him. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Tamar Frankel
Affected employees may file a complaint with the Department of Labor. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:51 pm
This important document from the American Immigration Lawyers Association is printed here in full. [read post]
30 Jul 2024, 1:56 pm by Matthew J. Roberts, Esq.
Just one instance of using the N-word epithet towards an African American coworker may be severe enough to be unlawful racial harassment in violation of the FEHA (Bailey v. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 8:04 am
American Civil Liberties Union, et al. (08-565). [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:30 am
Saint-Gobain Performance Plastics (retaliation for verbal complaints under Fair Labor Standards Act) Staub v. [read post]