Search for: "AT&T Corp. v Service W., Inc."
Results 421 - 440
of 516
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
AT&T Wireless Services, Inc., 177 Cal.App.4th 1235, 1253 (2009) ("[P]re-Proposition 64 caselaw that describes the kinds of conduct outlawed under the UCL is applicable to post-Proposition 64 cases such as the present case. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 11:25 am
He alleged oral promises made by the individual defendants, Barton W. [read post]
2 Oct 2009, 7:05 am
See Pony Express Courier Corp. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
" Valerio, 2008 WL 3286976 at *2.We just couldn't get enough, so we returned to pre-service removal here, to tell our readers about Vitatoe v. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Id. at 780.Sounds like a malpractice case, doesn't it.Well, a manufacturer's representative was present for the surgery - to make sure the device was "correctly calibrated" and "functioning properly" - a service that the defendant routinely provided. 851 N.E.2d at 781. [read post]
16 Sep 2009, 1:47 pm
(Lynn, MA; John Gillespie, President) All Stars Labor Service Inc. [read post]
28 Aug 2009, 8:25 am
See id.; RRX Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
(W. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 6:50 am
Corp. [read post]
3 Aug 2009, 6:18 am
GMBH v Geox SPA (PatLit) (Gray on Claims) EWHC (Pat): PPDs and piecemeal litigation: MMI Research Ltd v Cellxion Ltd & Ors (PatLit) EWHC: When anticompetition spices up competition, greyhounds lose their appeal: Bookmakers’ Afternoon Greyhound Services Ltd & Ors v Amalgamated Racing & Ors (IPKat) LOCOG demands Olympic Removals stop using Olympic symbol (IPKat) Infringing goods in transit: are patents more efficacious than trade… [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 5:06 am
Corp. v. [read post]
30 Jul 2009, 3:32 am
Group, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 3:00 am
Berger, 567 S.E.2d 265, 278 (W. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 2:00 am
: Patent bar, doctors face off in Prometheus v Mayo (The Prior Art) US Copyright Rights owners taking on small victims – Warner Music vs ‘Keyboard Cat’ YouTube clip; DC Comics vs John Stacks over figurines; Frank Gaylord vs postal service over art image on stamps (1709 Copyright Blog) US Copyright – Decisions District Court Colorado: Republishing third party rankings in marketing material might be copyright/trade mark… [read post]
17 Jul 2009, 11:33 am
Alpex Computer Corp. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 8:36 pm
Wackenhut Services, Inc., 2006 WL 1469348, at *22 (E.D. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 6:28 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2009, 6:45 am
(ITC 337 Law Blog) GOOD magazine article on Erich Spangenberg: The ethics of patent trolling (The Prior Art) US Patents – Decisions CAFC to hear claim and continuation rule case en banc; litigation schedule set: Tafas v Doll (Filewrapper) (Patent Docs) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (IP Watchdog) (Inventive Step) (IP Spotlight) (Gray on Claims) (Managing Intellectual Property) (Inventive Step) CAFC: Properly construed claims failed to read on preferred… [read post]
