Search for: "AT&T Mobility Services, LLCĀ " Results 421 - 440 of 840
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2010, 10:22 am by Gene Quinn
NTP has filed suit in the Eastern District of Virginia against the following defendants as named in the litigations: Alltel Corp.; Apple Inc.; AT&T Mobility, LLC; Google Inc.; HTC Corp.; LG Electronics Inc.; Microsoft Corp.; Motorola Inc.; Palm Inc.; Sprint Nextel Corp.; T-Mobile USA Inc.; Verizon Wireless; and Yahoo! [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
AT&T Mobility LLC, 530 F.3d 293, 298-99 (4th Cir. 2008) to support this proposition. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 11:35 am by John G. Papianou
  Although the California Supreme Court had held that waivers of class arbitration are unenforceable in Discover Bank, the United States Supreme Court rejected, and invalidated, that holding in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 1:46 pm by Jeffrey May
by Jeffrey May Wolters Kluwer Law & Business The Department of Justice will not challenge a proposed acquisition by Verizon Wireless of a significant portfolio of wireless spectrum licenses from a consortium of four cable companies and the subsequent transfer of a significant amount of that spectrum to T-Mobile USA; however, the parties will be required to modify separate marketing agreements to settle charges that they would, if left unaltered, harm competition by… [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:36 pm by Kelly
Productions LLC v Aftermath Records (IP Osgoode) District Court S D New York shuts down LimeWire file-sharing service: Arista v Lime Wire (Shades of Gray) (TorrentFreak) (ArsTechnica) (Recording Industry vs. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 1:55 pm by AALRR
AT& T Mobility LLC., the United States District Court for the Northern District of California agreed with the conclusion of the court in Quevedo v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 11:24 am by Derek Dissinger
 This is why they are able to do things lawyers can't do, such as use celebrity endorsements. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
July 6, 2016), upheld the enforceability of non-compete and confidentiality agreements assigned by Ozark Mobile Imaging to Mobilex as part of Mobilex’s purchase of Ozark’s assets. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 8:26 am by James P. Flynn
July 6, 2016), upheld the enforceability of non-compete and confidentiality agreements assigned by Ozark Mobile Imaging to Mobilex as part of Mobilex’s purchase of Ozark’s assets. [read post]
6 May 2021, 8:24 am by Kristian Soltes
As a result, brands have had to adapt to the mobile-centric consumer market and the movement towards mobile wallets. [read post]
11 Jun 2021, 9:20 am by Kristian Soltes
Earlier this year, a surcharging ban in Kansas was struck down after CardX LLC, a surcharging-services provider, filed suit against it. [read post]