Search for: "Ab v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 820
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2016, 9:44 am
On 17 August 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law AB 2159, a landmark piece of legislation that prohibits the consideration of a person’s immigration status in determining damages in personal injury and wrongful death cases. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:25 am
Senator Ron Wyden published an article in Wired this week, co-authored by Matt Blaze and Lawfare’s own Susan Landau, alarmingly entitled, ”The Feds Will Soon Be Able to Legally Hack Almost Anything. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:40 am
And, indeed, as an investor operating in the private sector, the ability of the Norwegian SWF to assert some considerable influence on the way in which the Duke Board responds to its responsibilities to respect hum ab rights, including the human rights associated with environmental degradation, should have been an important element in the Ethics Council's calculus. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 10:30 am
The court held in Rodriguez that an award for the loss of future wages should consider what an undocumented person would earn in his or her country of origin and not in the United States. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 7:39 am
Yesterday, Governor Brown acted on what was known as AB 2159 by signing it into law.See below with an update provided by Attorneys Halpern and Montevideo:On May 2nd & 3rd, Consumer Attorneys of California (CAOC), including its members from San Diego, was in Sacramento meeting with California Assembly Members and Senators to discuss, among many topics, a bill to stop a prevalent discriminatory civil litigation practice aimed at marginalizing plaintiffs based on their immigration… [read post]
18 Jul 2016, 1:30 am
ZM v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Northern Ireland); HA (Iraq) v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 12–14 January 2016. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 5:00 am
(In some cases, like United States v. [read post]
13 Jul 2016, 4:00 am
The State courts and legislatures The first is the decision of the United States Supreme Court in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 8:26 pm
See Larry Harmon Picture Corp. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 11:40 am
” Another potential consequence would be ISIS turning to “less conventional military tactics” and inspiring attacks elsewhere including Europe and the United States. [read post]
4 Jun 2016, 8:23 am
State of Delaware as a guide when determining the presence of “excessive” restrictions. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
For the United States, Clay Trivett, Robert Swann, Edward Ryan and Major Christopher of the U.S. [read post]
17 May 2016, 3:56 am
Beginning with Ab-Tech Cons., Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2016, 5:38 am
Many New York City Uber drivers use the Uber app more than 35 hours a week—pretty much full-time—in contrast to the rest of the United States, where the majority of drivers use the app less than 10 hours a week, according to Plouffe. [read post]
10 May 2016, 4:21 pm
It should be noted that the issue classifying actions as direct versus derivative remains in the United States. [read post]
3 May 2016, 9:00 pm
Inc., No. 2015-1456 and AstraZeneca AB v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 7:18 am
U.S. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 6:05 am
(Here, in United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 1:33 pm
Yesterday, the United States and Saudi Arabia announced their new united front when it comes to sanctioning terrorist organizations. [read post]
