Search for: "Adam Feldman"
Results 421 - 440
of 815
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 3:59 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines empirical evidence suggesting that “this term [is] the Court’s slowest in recent years for releasing the first two orally argued decisions. [read post]
9 Dec 2017, 6:12 pm
"Decisions, Decisions": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
8 Dec 2017, 4:12 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines evidence suggesting that Judge Brett Kavanaugh of the U.S. [read post]
7 Dec 2017, 12:06 pm
"The Next Nominee to the Supreme Court": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:10 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes data from 2005 to 2017 “on lower court dissents as well as on other aspects of appeals court cases that may signal the significance of these cases to justices,” such as “majority/dissenting pairs of judges with multiple cases reviewed by the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 11:50 am
"Major Players in the Lower Courts": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
21 Nov 2017, 4:12 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman “looks at th[e] attorneys … who ha[ve] filed successful petitions for the current term [and] tracks these attorneys’ success at bringing cases to the Court on cert since the 2013 term. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 2:52 pm
" Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 4:13 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines how the parties in Masterpiece Cakeshop v. [read post]
13 Nov 2017, 9:50 am
" Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
6 Nov 2017, 3:59 am
’” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman examines data from the 13 oral arguments to date this term “to categorize how justices’ names are mentioned during oral argument” and to explore whether and when these references might serve a strategic purpose. [read post]
5 Nov 2017, 10:00 pm
"Name Dropping in Oral Argument": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
26 Oct 2017, 5:59 am
Yes, genitalia counting has reached SCOTUS, with an analysis by Adam Feldman. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 4:11 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman analyzes “the previous five years of data on Supreme Court oral arguments to break down the participation and winning rates of male and female attorneys,” concluding that although “women make up almost 1/3 of amici, they make up only 13% of all merits arguers and only 11% of all non-governmental merits arguers,” but that “[o]n a per-attorney basis, women were more successful than men in the following… [read post]
22 Oct 2017, 7:33 pm
"A Dearth of Female Attorneys at Supreme Court Oral Arguments": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 4:27 am
” Briefly: At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman breaks down the track record before Supreme Court of the solicitor general’s office over time, concluding that “[l]ooking across the history of the office …, the OSG’s success during the Obama Administration was not only at a recent low, but also at a historic low. [read post]
14 Oct 2017, 2:22 pm
"A Record Set by the OSG During the Obama Years": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:09 am
” At Empirical SCOTUS, Adam Feldman identifies the attorneys who argued most frequently, and had the highest success rates, in “all single vote margin decisions during the Roberts Court or since the beginning of the 2005 term. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 1:33 pm
"Attorneys in the Clutch": Adam Feldman has this post at his "Empirical SCOTUS" blog. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 3:58 pm
[Dorf on Law] * Speaking of SCOTUS, Adam Feldman reads the oral-argument tea leaves from the first week of the new Term. [read post]
