Search for: "Adam May" Results 421 - 440 of 13,277
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Sep 2023, 1:40 am by centerforartlaw
John Re (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/east-hampton-man-pleads-guilty-manhattan-federal-court-fraudulent-sales-purported) In re Stolen Stradivarius (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/manhattan-us-attorney-and-fbi-announce-return-stolen-stradivarius-violin-heirs-musician) In re The Holy Trinity Appearing to Saint Clement by Giambattista Tiepolo (https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/manhattan-deputy-us-attorney-and-fbi-assistant-director-announce-return-italy-painting) About Andrew… [read post]
11 May 2021, 5:49 am by James Romoser
Drive Supreme Court Gender Gap (Kimberly Strawbridge Robinson, Bloomberg Law) The Supreme Court considers an important showdown over abortion this week (Ian Millhiser, Vox) A Supreme Court Ruling Protecting Payday Lenders Could Also Save Facebook and Martin Shkreli (Mekela Panditharatne) Let’s Get Partisan: The Importance of Appointing Party in the Justices’ Votes and More (Adam Feldman, The Juris Lab) SCOTUS hears last oral argument in ‘relatively slow’ 2020 term… [read post]
7 May 2021, 7:21 am by James Romoser
Philadelphia, the Supreme Court Should Remember That Foster Care Is for the Children (James Dwyer, National Review) The New, Conservative Supreme Court Is Returning to the Second Amendment (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker) Democrats wary of appearing to push Justice Breyer out despite their small window to replace him (Ariane de Vogue, Manu Raju & Phil Mattingly) The post The morning read for Friday, May 7 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
12 May 2022, 7:10 am by James Romoser
What the lawyers behind key LGBTQ Supreme Court victories say (Chris Geidner, Grid) The post The morning read for Thursday, May 12 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
5 May 2021, 7:41 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Wednesday morning read: How Amy Coney Barrett has changed the Supreme Court in ways Kavanaugh hasn’t (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Supreme Court seems skeptical that law helps all convicted of crack cocaine offenses (Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) Supreme Court Weighs Crack Cocaine Sentencing Disparity (Brian Naylor, NPR) One Court on High with Twelve Circuits Below (Adam Feldman, The Juris Lab) The New Trend Keeping Women Out of the Country’s Top Legal Ranks (Sarah… [read post]
3 May 2023, 7:23 am by SCOTUSblog
Bush win the 2000 election (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Dueling narratives at the Senate hearing on the Supreme Court (Nina Totenberg, NPR) Democrats call for new supreme court ethics rule amid Clarence Thomas scandal (Chris Stein, The Guardian) Justices Wrestled With Court’s Power in Landmark Abortion Case, Papers Show (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) America’s anything-goes Supreme Court (Edward Luce, Financial Times) The post The morning read for Wednesday, May 3 appeared… [read post]
12 May 2023, 6:34 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court rejects challenge to California pork industry restriction (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Moore v Harper parties split on whether US Supreme Court should drop case (CJ Staff, The Carolina Journal) Supreme Court Throws Out Fraud Convictions in Albany Scandals (Adam Liptak & Luis Ferré-Sadurní, The New York Times) Supreme Court rules against Puerto Rican journalists seeking records from financial oversight board (Associated… [read post]
9 May 2022, 7:30 am by James Romoser
(Adam Liptak, The New York Times) With an unprecedented leak, Roberts appears suddenly ineffectual (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Supreme Court Leak Prompts New Look at Old Way of Doing Business (Sam Skolnik, Andrea Vittorio, & Madison Alder, Bloomberg Law) Abortion rights activists demonstrate outside conservative Supreme Court justices’ homes (Rebecca Shabad, NBC News) The post The morning read for Monday, May 9 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
4 May 2023, 7:33 am by SCOTUSblog
Judicial Accountability (Steve Vladeck, One First) Sheldon Whitehouse vs. the Supreme Court (The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board) The post The morning read for Thursday, May 4 appeared first on SCOTUSblog. [read post]
15 May 2023, 8:06 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Monday morning read: Memos show how Supreme Court justices scramble at the end of the session (Joan Biskupic, CNN) Supreme Court to ponder Democratic lawmakers’ lawsuit over Trump hotel documents (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) 16 Crucial Words That Went Missing From a Landmark Civil Rights Law (Adam Liptak, The New York Times) The Supreme Court outlawed split juries, but hundreds remain in prison anyway (Jason Breslow, NPR) US supreme court pursuing rightwing agenda via… [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:51 am by SCOTUSblog
Here’s the Friday morning read: Supreme Court Sharply Limits the EPA’s Ability to Protect Wetlands (Emma Ricketts, Inside Climate News) How Supreme Court’s EPA ruling will affect U.S. wetlands, clean water (Timothy Puko & Robert Barnes, The Washington Post) How Warhol Turned the Supreme Court Justices Into Art Critics (Adam Gopnik, The New Yorker) In Capitols and Courthouses, No End to National Divide Over Gun Policy (Shaila Dewan, The New York Times) Abortion… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:48 am
Must Add Registry To Comply With Federal Adam Walsh ActNASHVILLE, Tenn. -- The state could end up missing out on millions of dollars in federal money now that the Senate has dropped a bill to [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 8:52 am
6-3-2010 Ohio:The Ohio Supreme Court today struck down a provision of the state's 2007 sex-offender law, saying it is unconstitutional for the state to reclassify sexual offenders convicted under a previous law.The ruling means additional reporting requirements imposed on thousands of Ohioans are rescinded and return to what the requirements were before the law, known as the Adam Walsh Act, was [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 7:45 pm
"Justices Look Again at How Police May Search Homes": Adam Liptak will have this article Thursday in The New York Times. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 10:36 am by Sheppard Mullin
While, under the law, employers may still view any publicly available information, they may not compel employees to disclose account passwords or “friend” company personnel. [read post]