Search for: "Administrative Review Board"
Results 421 - 440
of 14,510
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2024, 9:24 am
WCAB panel decisions are citeable authority, particularly on issues of contemporaneous administrative construction of statutory language. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:31 am
Once the Appeals Board has acted on a timely filed petition for reconsideration by either granting it or denying it, or once the Appeals Board issues a final order, decision, or award after granting reconsideration on its own motion, a party may seek timely appellate review of that final decision by filing a petition for writ of review ( Lab. [read post]
18 Apr 2024, 7:20 am
But that proposal was abandoned after President Biden’s 2021 Executive Order No. 13990 required a review of all federal regulations promulgated by the Trump Administration that conflict with the national interests of promoting and protecting public health and the environment. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:31 am
(Administrative Procedures Act (APA); National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA); Tribal Consultation) Perez v. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 10:00 am
Kevin Duff, board-certified in clinical neuropsychology, performed Ms. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Board of Educ. [read post]
17 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
Matter of Board of Educ. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 4:27 pm
The New York Times editorial board has a right to call on Israel to follow American government advice about Gaza, or to call on Russia to free Wall Street Journal reporter Evan Gershkovich. [read post]
16 Apr 2024, 5:01 am
When asked whether the Biden administration was satisfied with Israel’s efforts at increasing aid to Gaza, Kirby said, “The aid is getting in. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
The magistrate also held that the FRBSF is not an agency of the U.S. government and thus cannot be compelled to open a master account under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) or through a writ of mandamus. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 2:33 pm
The Court stated, “the Director may review final PTAB decisions and, upon review, may issue decisions [] on behalf of the Board” and that “[w]hat matters is that the Director have the discretion to review decisions rendered by APJs. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
In the Arthrex ruling, the Court found that the constitutional Appointments Clause violation created by the process for appointing administrative patent judges (APJs) to the PTAB was best cured by review of APJ decisions by the USPTO Director. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:15 pm
In the Arthrex ruling, the Court found that the constitutional Appointments Clause violation created by the process for appointing administrative patent judges (APJs) to the PTAB was best cured by review of APJ decisions by the USPTO Director. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 11:04 pm
Which brings us to a quick review of applicable regulatory takings law. [read post]
13 Apr 2024, 3:39 pm
The Department of Industrial Accidents’ reviewing board affirmed the administrative judge’s ruling and imposed a penalty on the employer for late payment of benefits awarded to the employee. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:58 pm
WCAB is the administrative body overseeing workers’ compensation claims in California. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 1:41 pm
This is a steep—and possibly irrational—price to pay for administrative expediency. [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 7:34 am
” On review to the NLRB, the Board expanded these remedies by further ordering Noah’s Ark to, “mail a copy of the remedial notice to every employee, post the notice in its plant, and allow ‘The Board or… its duly[] authorized representatives’ to inspect the facility for up to a year. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply… [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that "the [Board} is the administrative agency responsible for making the final determination" and the court's role "is to examine whether the [Board's] determination was supported by substantial evidence".Citing Matter of Morgan v Warren County, 191 AD3d 1129, the Appellate Division explained that there must be sufficient findings of facts in the first instance and the Appellate Division could not supply… [read post]
