Search for: "Alexander v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2009, 4:43 pm
On July 14, 2009, the Court of Appeals published its Per Curiam Opinion in the consolidated matters of State of Michigan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2006, 2:50 pm
Public Disclosure Comm'n v. [read post]
3 Jun 2012, 10:27 am
United States, 376 U.S. 364, 367 (1964). [read post]
26 Jul 2009, 1:04 pm
In Alexander v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 4:03 pm
United States DOI (sacred sites)Mishewal Wappo Tribe of Alexander Valley v. [read post]
8 Sep 2007, 12:36 pm
Rock Against Racism, 491 U.S. 781, 795 n.5 (1989); see also Alexander v. [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 11:12 am
"The case reference is HTC Corp. v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 8:09 pm
(2) I also discuss the concurrence in Bush v. [read post]
28 Oct 2024, 7:48 am
Furthermore, the appellate court reiterated that financial difficulties and litigation do not excuse nonuse or toll the running of the nonuse period (To-Ricos, Ltd. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2025, 5:30 am
Case date:24 February 2025 Case number: No. 24-30111 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law by… [read post]
23 Dec 2024, 7:24 am
Case date: 22 October 2024 Case number: No. 23-16060 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law More from our authors: Trade Mark Law in Europe: Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Fourth Edition by Ulrich Hildebrandt€ 176 Concise European Design Law … [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 2:20 pm
State legislators are being urged to find a way to correct inaccuracies in the registry. [read post]
11 Mar 2025, 6:38 am
Because the district court had dismissed the state-law unfair competition claims solely due to the dismissal of the federal claims, the appellate court reinstated them as well (Cardinal Motors, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2018, 7:45 am
In Hamdi v. [read post]
27 Jan 2008, 8:01 pm
See United States v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 6:19 am
Alexander Dushku and R. [read post]
19 Jun 2006, 7:39 am
Bar Assn. v. [read post]
OMB declines to discount pipeline easement payment from highway expansion expropriation compensation
7 Aug 2011, 6:44 am
Read the decision at: Shypka v. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 10:32 am
” Nevada v. [read post]
28 Mar 2010, 7:00 am
State v. [read post]
