Search for: "Alvarez v. Alvarez" Results 421 - 440 of 1,344
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2018, 5:37 am by SHG
The problem is that the duty to disclose exculpatory material was established in Brady v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:04 pm by Public Employment Law Press
Claimant's allegation of impropriety amounts to nothing more than an allegation of corruption, which is insufficient to overcome judicial immunity (Rosenstein v State of New York, 37 AD3d 208, 208-209 [1st Dept 2007]; Tarter v State of New York, 68 NY2d 511, 518 [1986]; Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586), and no exception to application of the doctrine (Alvarez v Snyder, 264 AD2d 27, 34 [1st Dept 2000]; see Sassower, 96 AD2d at 586-587) is present here. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 10:16 am by Anita Davies
This was the conundrum facing the US Supreme Court is the case of United States v Alvarez, concerning the constitutionality of the 2006 “Stolen Valor Act”. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 9:09 am
Category: Recent Decisions;Workers’ Compensation Opinions;Tort Law Opinions Body: Below is today's workers' compensation Appellate Court opinion:AC32702 - Yeager v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 11:28 am by Kent Scheidegger
Alvarez, No. 11-210.Our brief for the Legion of Valor and CJLF is here. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 11:00 am
But Duenas-Alvarez requires that there be 'a realistic probability, not a theoretical possibility, that the State would apply its statute to conduct that falls outsidethe generic definition of a crime.' 549 U. [read post]
27 Sep 2010, 6:48 am by Matt C. Bailey
  Both orders collectively provide a solid basis for dispensing with an employer’s resistance to producing the contact information of the putative class, precertification.In Alvarez v. [read post]