Search for: "American Alternative Insurance v. American Protection Insurance" Results 421 - 440 of 508
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Instead of focusing on the usual struggle between the board and shareholders, Blair and Stout study a team production model comprised of shareholders, management, employees and even creditors.[27] It is this team which the board, as a "mediating hierarchy," is designed to protect, and not the shareholders interests alone. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
They became part of the “corporate offensive” against activism[6] in response to the increase of American citizens speaking out on environmental and other social issues.[7] This phenomenon migrated to other jurisdictions such as Canada and Australia due to a similar rise in activism. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 11:02 pm by Colin Murray
Lord Hope recently sought to highlight the limits of the judicial role in the Axa Insurance (2011) case, by contrasting it with the focus of Parliament (at [49]): While the judges, who are not elected, are best placed to protect the rights of the individual, including those who are ignored or despised by the majority, the elected members of a legislature of this kind are best placed to judge what is in the country’s best interests as a whole. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 11:07 am by R. Grace Rodriguez, Esq.
Dear Friends:Just wanted to tell you about this case that was recently decided against Aurora Loan Services. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
: (Spicy IP), It’s a mad idea, but it might just work – Sun’s decision to reduce number of patent applications: (IAM) More alternative ADR practices: preventing patent shark attacks: (The IP ADR Blog), The ADR: insurance and indemnity agreements – protecting against patent terrorists: (The IP ADR Blog), Language and IP value and valuation: (Pat Sullivan’s Blog)   Global - Copyright Grammy winner, Joss Stone, shows… [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 7:13 am
Inc. 4743 East Northern Lights Boulevard Anchorage, AK 99508 Phone: (907) 337-7678 (V/TTY); (800) 478-7678 (Toll Free in AK only) Fax: (907) 337-7671 E-mail: parents@parentsinc.org Web: http://www.parentsinc.org Visual Impairments Center for Blind Adults (Anchorage) 3903 Taft Drive Anchorage, AK 99517 Phone: (907) 248-7770 (V/TDD); (800) 770-7517 (Toll Free) Fax: (907) 248-7517 E-mail: carolynp@gci.net Web: http://www.alaskablind.com Am [read post]
22 Apr 2016, 7:59 am by Adam Klein
As the Supreme Court explained in Baker v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:10 pm by Eugene Volokh
That may itself have moral relevance — though one can of course also argue that it’s morally good for poor children to be protected from dangerous pools by the deterrent effects of liability.Likewise (though this example isn’t directly relevant here), an economic analysis of whether some policy will cause aggregate social harm or benefit will often be premised on moral judgments about whose interest count: Should you aggregate the harm or benefit to all Americans?… [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 7:17 pm by Frank Pasquale
As with the market fundamentalism in Lochner v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 11:30 pm by Martin George
Governments also tend to respond to economic crises with protective legislation, increasing the legal regulation of businesses and markets, and restricting economically sensitive transactions. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 5:17 pm
District court's denial of motion to suppress the evidence seized after search of the boat is affirmed over claims of error that: 1) defendants did not consent to the search; and 2) the district court erred in its alternative determination that the search met the requirements of a border search. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
The first case study is an analysis of various lawyers’ and law firms’ blogs about the 2014 Supreme Court case of Clark v. [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 1:54 pm by Bexis
, 2010 WL 4870149, at *7 (quoting State Farm Florida Insurance Co. v. [read post]