Search for: "Application of Smith" Results 421 - 440 of 7,585
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Feb 2010, 3:52 am by SOIssues
The United States Supreme Court in 2003 stated in Smith v Doe that the ex post facto application of these Sex Offender Registration Laws was not Punitive in nature, but civil and regulatory intent. [read post]
1 Feb 2022, 12:32 am by Roel van Woudenberg
Thus, the applicants of the priority application introduced the right to claim priority into the later patent application. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 11:13 am by Hull & Hull LLP
  When you last podcasted, Nadia, you were podcasting with David Smith and I understand you were talking about the issue of costs in estate litigation. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Smith was not in compliance with the policy, as he never submitted an application for long-term disability benefits. [read post]
10 Feb 2022, 8:49 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Smith was not in compliance with the policy, as he never submitted an application for long-term disability benefits. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 8:08 pm by cdw
The trial court’s failure to do so “[went] to the very basis of the case” and “vitally affected [the applicant’s] defensive theory” at the punishment phase, because the jury had no adequate means to act upon the applicant’s mitigation theory, such as it was. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 5:10 am by Andrew Koppelman
Smith held that “courting anarchy” in this manner was a conclusive reason to hold that there is no constitutional right to religious exemptions from laws of general applicability. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:17 am by Dennis Crouch
  Smith, and Andrew Cheslock, Foley & Lardner LLP[1] The USPTO’s new Track 1 Prioritized Examination program allows an applicant to reach final disposition (allowance, final rejection, abandonment) within 12 months of filing. [read post]
28 Jul 2021, 10:19 am by Tom Smith
” In prior cases, there was ample evidence of a majority that would overturn Smith. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 11:33 pm by Orin Kerr
Smith of the Southern District of Texas with applications for cell-site records under 2703(d). [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 5:00 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Beck of the Philadelphia office of Reed Smith Law Firm. [read post]
10 Aug 2023, 8:47 pm by Patent Docs
Zurko of the application (deferential for factual determinations) of the standard-of-review provisions in the Administrative Procedures Act. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
It was with this understanding that the Patent Office promulgated rules making the Federal Rules of Evidence applicable to these proceedings. [read post]
27 Jul 2013, 9:45 pm by Patent Docs
Arner of Finnegan Henderson Farabow Garrett & Dunner will provide guidance to patent counsel regarding the impact of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act (AIA) on Section 102 and prior art, and offer best practices for utilizing prior art in patent applications. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 9:37 pm
Contents include:Henrik Jorem, Protecting Human Rights in Cases of Urgency: Interim Measures and the Right of Individual Application under Article 34 ECHR Vebjørn L Horsfjord, The Russian Orthodox Church: Two Discourses on Human RightsPeter Scharff Smith, Imprisonment and Internet-Access - Human Rights, the Principle of Normalization and the Question of Prisoners Access to Digital Communications TechnologySindre Bangstad, Failing to Protect Minorities Against Racist… [read post]
1 Aug 2018, 11:08 am by Tom Kosakowski
 Applicants must have a Bachelor's degree and prior experience, preferably in academia. [read post]