Search for: "Associated Transports, Inc. v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 579
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jun 2010, 8:04 am by Erin Miller
Opinion below (9th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioners’ reply Case in which the United States recently filed an amicus brief in response to the Court’s call for the views of the Solicitor General: Title: CSX Transportation, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 10:04 am by Steven M. Taber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 9:54 am by smtaber
Judge Levi issued a 2002 order granting partial summary judgment in favor of the United States. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 6:15 am by Steven Peck
COLA stated that the matter would be referred to COLA's Contract Fiscal Compliance Unit for a determination. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:04 pm by Raymond Millien
After applying and/or securing patent and other IP rights in the United States, SMEs should think globally. [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:54 pm
  This bill is intended to supersede a California appellate ruling, Progressive Concrete Inc., v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 11:29 am by @ErikJHeels
(Mattapan, MA) Campanelli Associates Iii Corporation (Braintree, MA) Campos Transportes Inc. [read post]
21 May 2010, 7:22 am by Susan Brenner
Bynum, Brief for the United States 2008 WL 4974084. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– EPA News Release, May 5, 2010 Albaugh, Inc., an agrichemical company based in Ankeny, Iowa, has agreed to pay a $27,360 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations related to the importation of nearly 1,000 tons of misbranded pesticide from Argentina. [read post]
5 May 2010, 3:00 pm by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
He was a law clerk to United States District Judges Richard A. [read post]
3 May 2010, 9:30 pm by admin
Smith Distributing Company, Inc. entered into an agreement with the U.S. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:17 pm by WIMS
Plaintiffs-Appellants appealed the district court's dismissal of their pre-enforcement challenge to the anti-animal-fighting provisions of the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), naming as defendants the United States, the Secretary and Department of Agriculture, the Attorney General and Department of Justice, and the Postmaster General and the United States Postal Service. [read post]