Search for: "Atkins v. Atkins"
Results 421 - 440
of 847
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Feb 2018, 11:20 am
Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815, 818 (1988); Atkins v. [read post]
29 Aug 2006, 10:20 am
See Atkins v. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 7:33 am
Although some have argued that Dookhan’s dry-labbing demonstrates the necessity of the Supreme Court’s 2009 decision in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
Cain 13-1433Issue: (1) Whether a state court that considers the evidence presented at a petitioner's penalty phase proceeding as determinative of the petitioner's claim of mental retardation under Atkins v. [read post]
29 Nov 2016, 4:38 pm
Florida, 134 S.Ct. 1986 (2014) and Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:12 pm
Supreme Court ruled in 2002 that it was unconstitutional to execute offenders with mental retardation in the case of Atkins v. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 8:35 am
In the 2002 Atkins v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 7:49 am
That's just a tentative thought, however.What I find more interesting is the dog that doesn't bark in Rick's article, despite his extensive discussion of cases like Atkins v. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 4:00 am
The case Medos Services Corporation v. [read post]
20 Jun 2015, 11:53 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Sep 2024, 9:30 pm
Kimberly Atkins Stohr will moderate. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 7:36 am
In Georgia, meanwhile, the state supreme court has refused to designate Hill as mentally retarded, scoffing at the mandate of Atkins v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 5:09 pm
See Bancamerica Int'l USA Trust v. [read post]
7 Jul 2009, 12:11 pm
Supreme Court has already ruled the death penalty unconstitutional in cases involving defendants with mental retardation (Atkins v. [read post]
3 Sep 2013, 12:18 pm
Atkins [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 4:42 pm
” This provision was to be interpreted in the light of the common law background, which the Supreme Court summarised as follows [6-7]: “[A] working definition of what makes a statement defamatory, derived from the speech of Lord Atkin in Sim v Stretch [1936] 2 All ER 1237, 1240, is that “the words tend to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of right-thinking members of society generally. [read post]
26 Apr 2010, 10:49 pm
For one view of the old terminology, see Justice Scalia's dissent in Atkins v. [read post]
22 Nov 2015, 5:01 am
In Atkins v. [read post]
23 May 2022, 3:48 pm
Atkins (Thompson Coburn LLP) and Alan E. [read post]
3 Feb 2017, 11:47 am
The case is Edwards v. [read post]
