Search for: "Attorney General v. Olson"
Results 421 - 440
of 494
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Aug 2009, 2:06 pm
Walker basically accepted Ted Olson's strategy to put the pending Proposition 8 lawsuit, Perry v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
Solicitor General Kagan has filed a motion for divided argument in Citizens United v. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 8:22 am
Via Walter Olson, through Twitter. [read post]
5 Jul 2009, 9:21 pm
As for attorneys in general - I admit that, based on 37 years of dealing with the public, I am not the biggest fan of members of the legal profession. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:33 am
Attorney David Boies and former Solicitor General Ted Olson filed a federal lawsuit against California's marriage amendment, claiming that it violates the U.S. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 11:38 am
Justices Stevens and Breyer both seemed generally in agreement with Ginsburg. [read post]
28 May 2009, 7:07 am
BROWN, JR., in his official capacity as Attorney General of California; MARK B. [read post]
27 May 2009, 11:24 am
Olson, the U.S. solicitor general from 2001 to 2004 under President George W. [read post]
27 May 2009, 12:58 am
But in a surprise move Tuesday, attorneys Theodore Olson and David Boies, who opposed each other in Bush v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 1:53 pm
Led by attorneys Theodore B. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 9:33 am
She formally introduced Attorney General Holder to the Court and he delivered a few short remarks. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 7:27 am
"...Olson, who argued the Bush side in Bush v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2009, 11:41 am
Earlier this week, the Appellate Division decided the case of Baker v. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 8:43 am
Still, the outcome of the Citizens United case might be less sweeping than attorney Theodore B. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 3:07 pm
Solicitor General, will be appearing twice during the session: in Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 10:28 am
One check on the peremptory is that, since Batson v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 6:00 am
Robinson cited a case called Boekan v. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 4:10 am
., v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 1:37 pm
Olson, 495 U.S. 91, 96-100, 110 S.Ct. 1684 (1990); O'Connor v. [read post]
