Search for: "B H v. Review Board" Results 421 - 440 of 552
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
I am happy to report the publication of my article,  "The Corporate Social Responsibilities of Financial Institutions for the Conduct of their Borrowers: The View From International Law and Standards," Lewis & CLark Law Review 21(4):881-920 (2018). [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 5:58 am
Another good post to review is here, where we discuss Iacangelo v. [read post]
With regard to stock options, the most significant change occurred in 1992 with the requirement that stock options be valued at date of grant based on (a) the potential realizable value if stock were to appreciate by certain specified percentages or (b) Black-Scholes or other acceptable model of option valuation. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 7:34 am by Ben
The debate being played out across the globe presents many challenges, and it will be interesting to review further developments with this proposed right in future. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 12:17 am
.  A1485 Gunther (MS) -- Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for lifeSUMM : Amd SS168-h & 168-o, Cor L Requires registered sex offenders to remain registered for life. 01/09/07 referred to correction LAW / CORRECTNSA1531 Benjamin -- Provides guidelines for evaluating applications for barbers and cosmetology license where applicant has prior criminal recordSUMM : Amd SS434 & 438, Gen Bus L Provides that persons who have a criminal record… [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Media Law in Other Jurisdictions Albania The Tirana Times had a piece “Defamation lawsuits have increased in backdrop of govt’s pending anti-libel package” Australia In the case of Cheng v Lok [2020] SASC 14. the claimant, an Adelaide lawyer was awarded defamation damages in the total sum of $750,000 in a claim against a woman who gave his firm a bad review on Google.. [read post]
25 Feb 2023, 6:50 pm by admin
Irving Selecoff arrived in Glasgow, Scotland, from New York City, on board the SS. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]