Search for: "B. v. S." Results 421 - 440 of 57,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Aug 2019, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
By Donald Zuhn -- Earlier this month, in Genetic Veterinary Sciences, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 11:24 am by Kali Borkoski
  The transcript in Susan B. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 9:14 pm by Patent Docs
This decision, expressly applying the Supreme Court's revision to how courts apply the indefiniteness test in Nautilus Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 9:32 pm
Litig., 829 F.2d 1539 (11th Cir. 1987); La Mar v. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 6:11 am by Unreported Opinions
Civil litigation — Bad-faith filings — Attorney’s fees Oxana Parikh and Namish Parikh appeal from a judgment of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County, the Honorable Ronald B. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 2:36 am
Nationwide Building Society v Dunlop Haywards (DHL) Ltd (t/a Dunlop Heywood Lorenz) [2009] EWHC 254 (Comm); [2009] WLR (D) 61 “The ‘damages’ awarded in respect of  ’the damage in question’  from which reduction was made pursuant to s 2(3)(b) of the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 in the event of contributory negligence on the part of [...] [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 12:02 pm by Ahmad Adam
The TSX-V also added the following temporary relief measures that are also in effect until August 31, 2013: (a) with respect to the Offering Price Relief Measure and the Conversion Price Relief Measure, the TSX-V is modifying the 75% arm’s length requirement to allow up to an aggregate of $200,000 to be raised from related parties of the issuer without any arm’s length component to the private placement being required; (b) with respect to… [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 7:53 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) British Airways Plc v Unite the Union [2010] EWHC 1210 (QB) (17 May 2010) High Court (Family Division) B v B [2010] EWHC 193 (Fam) (15 January 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
18 Nov 2015, 4:22 pm by INFORRM
On 15 October 2015, the Spanish Supreme Court handed down judgment in the “right to be forgotten” case of  A & B v Ediciones El Pais SL [pdf](in Spanish). [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 2:50 pm by Clare Freeman, RWS, WD Mich
’"* "It stands to reason that a defendant’s substantial assistance will be the predominant factor in a district court’s decision to reduce a sentence pursuant to Rule 35(b). [read post]