Search for: "BARNES v. DEFENSE " Results 421 - 440 of 586
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Mar 2011, 7:05 am by Nabiha Syed
Bennett, consolidated with McComish v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 4:08 am by Fernando M. Pinguelo
  If the horse has left the barn and privileged communication was unintentionally released, prompt aggressive adherence to 502 (b) is your best defense. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 7:27 pm by cdw
Barnes & Noble recently announced that David R. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 8:08 am by Steve Hall
And: Defense attorneys saw the ruling as an important victory. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 7:00 pm by cdw
As happens when times allows, news we’ve either overlooked or that will appear in an upcoming edition: California has had its 53rd death inmate die of natural causes and yet no executions in 5 years Barnes & Noble recently announced that David R. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 6:25 am by James Bickford
  In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes looks at Camreta v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 4:42 pm by Brian Shiffrin
Both the United States Supreme Court and the New York Court of Appeals have held that once a defendant chooses to be represented by counsel, counsel and not the defendant has control over most strategic decisions are made by the attorney and not the defendant (Jones v Barnes, 463 US 745, 751 [1983]; People v White, 73 NY2d 468, 478 [1989]). [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm by axd10
Litigating in the shadow of death defense attorneys in capital cases. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Conor McEvily
Yesterday’s oral argument in The Boeing Company v. [read post]
31 Dec 2010, 11:50 am by Francis G.X. Pileggi
 The Court of Chancery rejected breach of fiduciary duty claims and upheld the poison pill defense that Barnes & Noble implemented as part of a plan to rebuff the hostile efforts of investor Ron Burkle to acquire Barnes & Noble, which is controlled by the Riggio family. [read post]
20 Dec 2010, 1:47 pm by Christine Dowling
Disparity in Federal Sentencing:  Boston Globe staff writer Jonathan Saltzman has this article on a recent study of the widened disparity in federal sentences in light of the case United States v. [read post]