Search for: "Bader v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,338
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2019, 9:00 pm
In Stokeling v United States, 586 U.S. ____ (2019), the U.S. [read post]
21 Jan 2019, 5:07 am
United States. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 2:07 pm
In 1987, Marshall was the deciding vote for the 5-4 majority in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 7:12 am
Bader v. [read post]
17 Jan 2019, 3:53 am
United States, in which the justices ruled that a state-law robbery conviction can qualify as a “violent felony” for the purposes of a sentencing enhancement under the Armed Career Criminal Act even when the conviction does not require the use of violent force, for this blog. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 4:10 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 9:28 am
See Bader v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 1:24 pm
United States). [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 7:03 am
United States, No. 17-5554. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 3:48 am
Wyoming, “an Indian treaty-rights case argued in the Supreme Court last Tuesday, revolves around a basic of federal Indian law: No promise to Indian people actually binds the United States. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:34 am
Many obituaries will focus on her prodigious and inspiring career in the United States: her journey, from a working-class upbringing in a single-parent family, to practice as a lawyer on child rights and in the Department of Justice, to service, in the District of Columbia Circuit, as the 1st woman Chief Judge of a U.S. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
The question arose in the case of Hamid Mohamed Ahmed Ali Rehaif, a citizen of the United Arab Emirates, who came to the United States on a student visa but was dismissed from school – and, as a result, was no longer in the country legally. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 7:04 am
She catalogs the justice’s occasional victories, like United States v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 1:54 pm
Today’s lone case for argument, Franchise Tax Board of California v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 10:10 am
The second argument on Monday was in Obduskey v. [read post]
9 Jan 2019, 7:14 am
Jonathan Ellis argued for the United States, and agreed with Wall-Street.com’s interpretation. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 3:57 am
” At Crime & Consequences, Kent Scheidegger writes that United States v. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 8:55 am
United States, the justices declined to decide whether Apprendi applies to criminal restitution – here, an order requiring two men to pay over $300,000 in restitution to CitiGroup. [read post]
7 Jan 2019, 6:40 am
United States, No. 17-9082, Justice Samuel A. [read post]
4 Jan 2019, 2:11 pm
And “no matter how the broader issue of” whether courts should generally review partisan-gerrymandering claims is resolved, they contended, this is such an easy case that the 2016 plan cannot stand: North Carolina Republicans had an “official state policy to maximize” their party’s representation in Congress, and under the plan Republicans in 2016 won 10 out of the state’s 13 congressional seats “even though the statewide vote was nearly… [read post]
