Search for: "Ball v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,083
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jun 2010, 10:33 am
State v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
On June 22, 2018, in Carpenter v. [read post]
9 Jul 2018, 10:10 am
On June 22, 2018, in Carpenter v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 2:08 pm
Commonwealth of Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 12:03 pm
In a world of politically fired up special prosecutors and Congress v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
A panel of the Washington Court of Appeals held in State v. [read post]
27 May 2019, 4:35 pm
However, the judge agreed with counsel for the defendant, Jonathan Scherbel-Ball, that the above approach to the first strand of the pleaded meaning was strained, forced and unreasonable [24]. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
4 Dec 2013, 6:34 am
Co. v United States, 148 U.S. 312 (1893); Phelps v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 6:27 am
Brian Johnston, Defensive End, Gardner-Webb.Johnston has great speed for his size, and was often double-teamed in college ball. [read post]
14 Nov 2021, 1:32 am
But the broader concept of unfairness under state competition law might have scope for preventing Apple from doing this. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 4:22 am
Folks who’ve been following this blog for years know that periodically I like to venture beyond New York’s borders to find and report on interesting decisions from other states in business divorce cases. [read post]
14 Feb 2005, 11:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2022, 9:29 am
The state of Oklahoma filed a petition with the Supreme Court, alleging that “No recent decision of this Court has had a more immediate and destabilizing effect on life in an American State than McGirt v. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:51 am
Presumably what's good for the United States is good for everyone else too. [read post]
31 May 2007, 1:15 pm
For comparison's sake, the United States Supreme Court held in Simmons that a defendant's incriminating statements in support of a motion to suppress on Fourth Amendment grounds (e.g., an admission that he owned the suitcase in which the drugs were found) weren't admissible at trial, holding that it's "intolerable that one constitutional right should have to be surrendered in order to assert another. [read post]
30 Aug 2016, 10:24 am
The Court of Appeals says the defendant may have a point.The case is Pierotti v. [read post]
13 Feb 2007, 5:29 pm
McConnell also wrote Wall Street Journal op-eds calling Roe v Wade illegitimate and calling Bush v Gore a muddled ruling. [read post]
