Search for: "Baron v. Baron" Results 421 - 440 of 532
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2009, 4:30 pm by Mark Beese
Coulter, Vice President and Chair, Client Development and Growth Practice, Hildebrandt José Cunningham, Chief Marketing Officer, Crowell & Moring LLP Beth Cuzzone, Director of Business Development, Goulston & Storrs Patrick V. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 12:32 pm
  See earlier ataxingmatter series on the AMT in which this is explained in detail:  The Senate and the House on the AMT (July 12, 2005); What Should Congress Do About the AMT (Part I, Part II, Part III, Part IV, Part V, Part VI). [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 4:40 pm
Todo lo cual podría evitarse si cambiábamos la ventana la primera vez que se rompía, y castigábamos debidamente al vándalo tirapiedra. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 3.0) 1. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 12:53 am
(IP finance) An IP strategist’s economic forecast for 2010: an outsider’s view and how one can outperform the ‘experts’ (IP Asset Maximizer Blog)   Australia Advisory Council on Intellectual Property proposes setting up IP dispute resolution centre to deal with patent disputes (Managing Intellectual Property)   Brazil IP infringement and capacity to sue in Brazil (IP tango) WTO rules in favour of Brazil, allows for cross retaliation against… [read post]
1 Aug 2009, 7:44 pm
Here is the abstract:Hoffman v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 3:52 am
Kansas City had to advance on penalty kicks against Minnesota (USL-1).The marquee game of the round will be Portland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 8:09 am
In a kinder and gentler time, before the era when big pharma v. generic Notice of Compliance litigation has almost taken over the Federal Court, Canada used to have lots of litigation about beer and spirits. [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
8 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
(Class 46)   India Chennai IP Appellate Board: Well-known trademarks - consumer recollection is key: Societe des Produits Nestle SA v Jai ram (International Law Office) Bombay High Court rules on the infringement of copyright in drawings: Indiana Gratings Private Limited & Anr v Anand Udyog Fabricators Private Limited & Ors (Spicy IP) Is ‘science’ essential for creating patent lawyers: some ‘general’ thoughts (Spicy… [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:20 pm
Todd Dickinson’s comments at Bio Conference (IAM) The Charles Rivers Ventures connection – CRV stakes in RPX Corp, Thinkfire and Intellectual Ventures (IAM) Obama Administration tackling patent backlog (IP Watchdog) Patent examiners told to issue patents (IP Watchdog) More funding needed for patent granting authority (IP Watchdog) Short note on patentability of product-by-process claims – Newman J’s opinion in 1985 case In re Thorpe: Abbott v Sandoz… [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 12:30 pm
Courtney Rachel Baron, An Eye for an Eye Leaves Everyone Blind: Fields v. [read post]