Search for: "Beecham v. Beecham"
Results 421 - 433
of 433
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Citizen Action v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 10:31 pm
A good example is Sayers and others v Smithkline Beecham plc and others, an England and Wales Queen's Bench Division last Wednesday from Mr Justice Keith, picked up by LexisNexis Butterworths' All England digests.The United States Department of Health and Human Services was involved in US proceedings in which it was alleged that the MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) and MR (measles, rubella) vaccinations in young children helped cause autism. [read post]
21 May 2007, 3:26 pm
Pfizer v. [read post]
25 Apr 2007, 11:26 pm
USA v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 9:48 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 178564, at *9 (E.D. [read post]
26 Jan 2007, 7:28 am
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 178564 (E.D. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 10:00 pm
Smithkline Beecham Corp., 2007 WL 178564 (E.D. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 4:53 pm
Cir. 2006).]The law review did not appear to discuss Exxon v. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 6:46 pm
There is a cite to SmithKline Beecham v. [read post]
14 Dec 2006, 4:08 am
SmithKline Beecham Consumer Health Care LP, No. [read post]
6 Dec 2006, 8:43 pm
Impax Labs v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 4:11 pm
SmithKline Beecham Corp., 413 F.3d 1318, 1325-26 (Fed. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:18 am
It contains just four reported cases, but they're pretty big ones: * Emanuel v Continental Shelf 128 Ltd (the ECJ's ruling that it's not deceptive for a trade mark consisting of a name to be registered in someone else's name, so long as no-one's pretending the person named has any connection with the proprietor's business);* SmithKline Beecham v Apotex (Court of Appeal decision on whether someone who isn't a party to patent infringement… [read post]
