Search for: "Brandes v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 2,954
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jan 2022, 3:26 am
Apple App Store antitrust case, Epic Games filed its opening brief with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit yesterday. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 11:25 am
From Jackson v. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:59 am
§ 1752) that are not included in the United States v. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 10:13 am
Then I'm not a teenager in the United States. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 6:04 am
Background Celgene markets pomalidomide as a multiple myeloma drug under the brand name Pomalyst®. [read post]
10 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
Nicklin J found that, because Ms Murray’s tweet was stated as fact, it had one meaning; the defence of truth failed. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 9:56 am
The Court therefore, entered judgment in favor of the United States and dismissed the case.By Lawrence M. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 4:20 am
The United States Olympic Committee v. [read post]
4 Jan 2022, 3:47 am
” The evidence showed that Coca Cola’s THUMS UP and LIMCA brands are well known in India and their reputation extends to the Indian-American population in the United States. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 12:39 pm
(Please note that these figures reflect only federal court securities class action lawsuit filings; the filing numbers do not include state court securities class action lawsuit filings during the year.) [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:01 pm
As its name suggests, the expropriation exception supplies federal courts with jurisdiction over certain cases concerning property taken by a foreign government: A foreign state shall not be immune from the jurisdiction of courts of the United States or of the States in any case . . . in which rights in property taken in violation of international law are in issue and that property or any property exchanged for such property is present in the United… [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am
This bifurcated system leads to a curious dynamic in United States patent law, namely between (i) patent infringement (as a question of fact) and (ii) claim construction (as a question of law or a mixed question of fact and law) decided by a judge. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 4:05 am
That was a clear allusion to FTC v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 4:36 am
As I mentioned a couple of days ago, Epic's opening brief on appeal is due later this month, and I strongly doubt that Epic can turn things around without a single-brand market definition. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 12:00 pm
In Milieudefensie et al. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 10:57 pm
"Apple's smartphone market share in the Netherlands (26%) is far lower than in the United States, and the Dutch ACM very appropriately explains that mobile app developers are facing an Apple-Google duopoly (without using that term--at least I couldn't find in the summary).Finally, here's the Coring v. [read post]
22 Dec 2021, 10:52 pm
My next app will have a subscription model, but also IAP offerings.Shortly before the Epic Games v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 1:48 pm
See United States v. [read post]
20 Dec 2021, 10:30 am
The TMA clears the path for legitimate businesses to register their marks by cleaning out the federal trademark register and giving the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) the ability to expedite the registration process. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
For example, in 2020 the PTO denied registration to the mark TRUMP TOO SMALL in connection with T-shirts, even though the applicant argued that the mark was “political commentary about presidential candidate and president Donald Trump that the relevant consumer in the United States would not understand to be sponsored by, endorsed by, or affiliated with Donald Trump. [read post]
