Search for: "Brown v. Jackson"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,100
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2022, 3:27 pm
Justice Brown Jackson, who recused herself from the Harvard case but heard the UNC case, asked several questions about the lack of evidence showing students are admitted or denied on the basis of race alone. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 4:00 pm
In Haaland v. [read post]
28 Oct 2022, 9:20 am
In her second day of oral arguments, Jackson made a splash during the argument in Merrill v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 3:05 pm
UNC and SFFA v. [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 1:06 pm
” But the Constitution, the group argues, is color-blind, and the court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Roe v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 5:19 pm
When newly seated Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson recused herself from the Harvard case, the Court split them back up so that she could hear the case against North Carolina. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
The debate in many ways goes back to Justice Holmes’s typically cryptic dissenting opinion in Lochner v. [read post]
25 Oct 2022, 6:00 am
Does Brown v. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Loving v. [read post]
20 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Ely had an important big idea—that judicial review (in a case like Brown v. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:50 pm
The reference to Justice Jackson is to the oral argument in Merrill v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 2:28 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson led the questioning on this point, focusing in part on the practical importance of a salary. [read post]
13 Oct 2022, 6:28 am
But Justice Sonya Sotomayor, joined by Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson, wrote an opinion dissenting from the denial of cert, arguing that the constitutional errors in Thomas’s case were so glaring she would have summarily reversed. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 9:01 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wanted to know why California’s interest in facilitating its residents’ moral opposition to animal cruelty justified more than labeling laws. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 6:52 pm
Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson indicated that they would have denied Ritter’s request and left the 3rd Circuit’s ruling in place. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 2:20 pm
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson also weighed in, in a question for Jeffrey Lamken, who represented the Humane Society of the United States. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:09 am
The justices were hearing Merrill v. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 5:01 am
Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corporation and expanded in West Virginia v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
Does it follow that Brown v. [read post]
