Search for: "Buck v State"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,165
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2007, 12:31 am
[16] Buck, supra note 2 [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:17 pm
But under City of Chicago v. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 6:48 am
Franchetta here: State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2020, 2:37 pm
Supreme Court in a Texas death penalty/ineffective assistance case, Buck v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 4:00 am
Buck v. [read post]
6 Apr 2024, 8:47 am
Com. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:26 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 4:19 pm
The Court noted the High Court decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2010] EWHC 2866 (Admin) that revocation of the plan by excecutive action was unlawful and also the Court of Appeal decision in R (Cala Homes (South) Ltd) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2011] EWCA Civ 639 that the intended revocation of the regional plan was a material factor that planning authorities could… [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 9:26 am
In other words, if the state of the case law was fuzzy at the time, the defendants win the case since they cannot be expected to know the state of the law the way a law professor or some other legal expert would. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
UPDATE: Reader David McCune writes: Don’t you get the sense that one reason Buck v. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 1:16 pm
Fireside Bank v. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:38 am
Ted Olson and David Boies, who fought opposing sides of Bush v. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 11:45 am
See Buck v. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 4:17 am
Last May in Buck v. [read post]
30 Mar 2010, 9:23 am
” @ThirdTierAmie Buck v. [read post]
3 May 2017, 8:49 am
Trump’s Administration stated that the Obama guidance was inconsistent with the language of Title IX and that the issue should be left to the states. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 8:39 am
Decisions over who gets busted and who doesn't affect large numbers of medical pioneers, average smokers, and make-a-buck dope dealers alike. [read post]
