Search for: "C Davis" Results 421 - 440 of 3,177
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2020, 9:59 am by HRWatchdog
Section 3203(A)(8)(C) limits the information to be given to the program elements in section (a). [read post]
28 Nov 2020, 6:48 pm by Howard Bashman
Davis, Josh Dawsey, Emma Brown, and Jon Swaine of The Washington Post have this report. [read post]
25 Nov 2020, 10:38 am
Sarnoff, Negative-Emission Technologies and Patent Rights after COVID-19 Gareth Davies, Climate Change and Reversed Intergenerational Equity: the Problem of Costs Now, for Benefits Later Daria Shapovalova, Arctic Petroleum and the 2°C Goal: a Case for Accountability for Fossil-Fuel Supply Chrysa Alexandraki, MRV of Emissions and Mitigation Action: the Paris Agreement and Financial Support for Transparency-Related Capacity Building in Developing Countries [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
” [4] Martin Davies et al., Nygh’s Conflict of Laws in Australia 36 (10th ed. 2020). [5] Paragraph 54 of the Handbook. [6] Ibid., paragraphs 31-45, and 47. [7] Ibid., paragraph 16. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 2:25 pm by Eric Quitugua
Levi, GLBTQ Legal Advocates & Defenders’ transgender rights project director; and Shedrick Davis, Lambda Legal’s western regional director, will be guest speakers. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 10:39 am by John Elwood
Saul, 19-1442, and Davis v. [read post]
23 Oct 2020, 8:39 am
”Zacharias Sautner (Frankfurt School of Finance & Management and ECGI)Response to the European Commission’s Consultation by ECGI Research MembersResponder:  Wolf-Georg Ringe (Hamburg University and ECGI) (Response 1)Discussion: John C. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am by Dennis Crouch
A glass globe, D, is fused to the glass stem, C. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 3:08 am by Liz Dunshee
According to this recent survey of 50 C-suite execs, only 8% felt comfortable that their company hasn’t previously engaged in practices that would be deemed unseemly under today’s ethics or standards – that broke down into 76% knowing of problematic practices or events, and 16% being unsure. [read post]
If A goes, B, C & D go with it.Step four: Because provision A is unconstitutional, provisions B, C & D should be enjoined, thereby redressing Hurley’s injury from B, C & D.The doctrinal logic underlying the inseverability-based standing theory is superficially sound and perhaps in certain contexts it would be persuasive. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 5:52 pm by Eugene Volokh
See Smolla & Nimmer on Freedom of Speech § 15:60 ("[C]ourts have often exhibited a blind spot for normal prior restraint and preliminary injunction standards when it comes to enforcement of copyright interests. [read post]