Search for: "C. K. R."
Results 421 - 440
of 4,042
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2015, 6:00 am
Stark and Jessica C. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 10:32 am
Park Henri C. [read post]
12 Jun 2012, 6:03 pm
Curran, Ryan K. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 1:01 am
Ditto for Sections 2.1033(c)(19)(i)-(ii), 27.14(k) and (s), 27.17(c), 27.50(d)(3), 27.1131, 27.1132, and 27.1134(c) and (f), all of which involve new "information collections" that first have to be run through the Paperwork Reduction Act drill at the Office of Management and Budget. [read post]
15 Feb 2013, 3:12 am
John a/k/a Sir Elton Hercules John, No. 12 C 3117, Slip Op. [read post]
2 May 2015, 9:27 pm
Jill K. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 8:48 pm
Luke K. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 6:06 pm
En cas d’examen accéléré, ce délai peut être réduit à 3 mois moyennant quelques formalités. [read post]
23 May 2019, 12:36 am
Beide Behauptungen sind falsch: Das schweizerische Bundesgesetz über den Datenschutz (DSG) ist für hängige Strafverfahren und damit für laufende Überwachungsmassnahmen nicht anwendbar (Art. 2 Abs. 2 lit. c DSG). [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:02 pm
R 104 is the implementing rule providing two additional fundamental procedural defects to wit, (a) the Board did not hold OPs despite a request to this end; or (b) it omitted to decide upon a request.[2.5] Since the list of grounds for review mentioned in R 104 is exhaustive and since the Board decided on the admission of an auxiliary request R 104 is of no relevance here. [3] The decision to accept late-filed documents E25 and E26 into the appeal proceedings, but to… [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 5:01 pm
examined as to their relevance for the decision (see R 19/10 [6.2] cited by the petitioner, who agrees).[3] This legal understanding is not in conflict with the decisions of the EBA according to which it is sufficient for the purposes of A 113(1) that the party concerned was aware of the arguments put forward by the adverse party, had an opportunity to answer them, and makes no contention that the Board of Appeal refused to hear them (see in particular R 18/09 [12]): this… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 11:45 pm
As pads did not constitute assistance in using a commode, K&C’s proposal was not lawful. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
Professional representatives are subject to the disciplinary power exercised by the Institute of Professional Representatives (epi) or the EPO (A 134a(1)(c)) whereas the disciplinary power to which legal practitioners are subject is a matter of national law and is exercised by national organisations or offices. [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
Bu istatistiklerin yayınlandığı tarih itibariyle, göçmenlik mahkemelerindeki yaklaşık 328 göçmen yargıcının önünde bekleyen 697,777 dosya veya yargıç başına 2,090 dosya bulunmaktadır. 2016 yılında sonuçlanan dosya sayısı 153.133 iken, 2017 yılında sonuçlanan dosya sayısı 169.150’ye yükselmiştir. 2018… [read post]
7 Oct 2018, 12:00 pm
Bu istatistiklerin yayınlandığı tarih itibariyle, göçmenlik mahkemelerindeki yaklaşık 328 göçmen yargıcının önünde bekleyen 697,777 dosya veya yargıç başına 2,090 dosya bulunmaktadır. 2016 yılında sonuçlanan dosya sayısı 153.133 iken, 2017 yılında sonuçlanan dosya sayısı 169.150’ye yükselmiştir. 2018… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 7:02 am
-C. [read post]
25 Nov 2011, 8:05 am
ödeyemeye gücümüz kalmad?. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 5:01 pm
”The reference number for the case (K 1959 EP) was the same as that which had been used in the opposition proceedings.[1.3] The fact that the address of the appellant was not stated in the notice of appeal (cf. [read post]
29 Jul 2019, 7:00 pm
Eine solche gemeinsame Verantwortlichkeit besteht nun auch ausdrücklich für Website-Betreiber, die einen «Gefällt mir»- beziehungsweise Like-Button von Facebook verwenden, wie der Europäische Gerichtshof (EuGH) mit Urteil C-40/17 vom 29. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 4:15 am
Asliye Hukuk Mahkemesi'nce Yargıtay Ceza Genel Kurulu'nun 22/01/2002 gün ve 294-1 kararında borcun ödenmemesinde makul sebep kavramından bahsedildiğini, bu nedenle borcun hangi nedenlerle yerine getirilmediğinin araştırılarak hukuki durumun belirlenmesinde zorunluluk olduğunu, Ödeme gücü olduğu halde borcunu ödemeyenlerin cezalandırılmasının gerektiği. [read post]
