Search for: "C. v. A."
Results 421 - 440
of 62,049
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2007, 1:18 pm
US v. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 4:02 am
LEXIS 684 (August 18, 2010): With respect to Rule 41(c), in State v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:59 pm
., Inc. v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 2:18 pm
In its judgment in Case C-531/07 Fachverband der Buch- und Medienwirtschaft v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 7:59 am
J.G. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2023, 8:51 am
Justice Jackson delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court in Lora v. [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 1:22 pm
C. [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 3:01 pm
C-SPAN has video of the Fox Television v. [read post]
20 Nov 2008, 10:08 pm
The Court of Justice has handed down a neat judgment in Case C-209/07 Competition Authority v. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 12:28 pm
In United States v. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Over the last year or two, C-SPAN has been putting its archived shows online. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 1:53 am
Sanofi (Case C-443/12) and Actavis v. [read post]
16 Aug 2011, 7:35 am
Davis v. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 3:00 pm
In Francois v. [read post]
15 Feb 2011, 2:22 am
Andersson v Staten genom Kronofogdemyndigheten i Jönköping, Tillsynsmynidigheten C-30/10; [2011] WLR (D) 44 “A provision of national law which excluded an employee from entitlement under the guarantee of payment of employees’ outstanding claims in the event of their employer’s insolvency, on the ground that the employee within the six months preceding the application for a declaration of insolvency had been the owner of an essential part of the… [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 3:22 am
Strong Segurança SA v Município de Sintra and another (Case C-95/10); [2011] WLR (D) 99 “Article 47(2) of Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18/EC (permitting an economic operator participating in a public tendering process for the provision of services to rely on the capacities of other entities, provided that it could prove that it would have at its disposal the resources necessary) did not apply to contracts which had as their object services referred to… [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:45 am
Koelzsch v État du Grand-Duché de Luxembourg (Case C-29/10); [2011] WLR (D) 93 “Where an employee carries out activities in more than one contracting state the country in which the employee ‘habitually carries out his work in performance of the contract’, within the meaning of article 6(2)(a) of the Rome Convention on the law applicable to contractual obligations, was that in which or from which, in the light of all the factors which characterised… [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court's decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
11 Sep 2019, 7:02 am
Here are the new materials in Williams & Cochrane LLP v. [read post]
