Search for: "CARRIER CORP"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,340
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 May 2007, 1:42 am
"
Judge Voids Congoleum's Pact With Asbestos Claimants, Faulting Lawyers "A New Jersey judge has ruled that Congoleum Corp.'s insurance carriers don't have to fund a $500 million settlement with the company's asbestos claimants, calling it a bad-faith deal engineered by lawyers acting collusively. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 8:50 am
The Federal Communications Commission has voiced support for the principle, and sanctioned Comcast Corp. this year for slowing some types of file-sharing traffic. [read post]
28 Jul 2006, 1:23 pm
The Board adopted the recommendations of the administrative law judge and found that the Respondent Union violated Section 8(b)(1)(A) and (2) of the Act by causing or attempting to cause Carrier Corp. not to hire Kip Traffican because he was a member of Local 420 who had gone to work for Merck, an employer that did not have a collective-bargaining agreement with the Respondent Union. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 10:29 am
Insurance carriers for two of those companies - Hyattsville, Md. [read post]
15 Jul 2009, 1:25 am
Apartments Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 12:27 am
Studies by both Willis and broker Guy Carpenter, a unit of Marsh & McLennan Companies Inc (MMC.N: Quote, Profile, Research), foresee losses to insurers of up to $3 billion, a serious but not fatal blow to the carriers who provide this coverage. [read post]
24 Jul 2007, 10:31 am
The Court cited to ABCO Refrigeration Supply Corp. v Designs by Keiser Corp., 239 A.D.2d 165 (1st Dep't, 1997) for the proposition that, there being no allegation of fraud, mistake, etc., there is no basis to vacate a stipulation that essentially calls for the defendant to pay the full amount of the Complaint.State Farm, by Picciano & Scahill, P.C., cited to some Second Department case law for the proposition that unconscionable stipulations should not be enforced. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 12:12 am
Microsoft Corp. sued the U.S. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 11:25 am
John noted the man’s claim arose not from the injury alone but from the rail carrier’s decision to illegally punish the worker for getting hurt. [read post]
30 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
Corp. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:44 pm
Southland Corp., 5 So.3d 754, 756 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009) (same). [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 1:33 pm
The question before the Court in Air Wisconsin Airlines Corp. v. [read post]
27 Dec 2012, 3:00 am
Frontline Processing Corp. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:50 am
Co., 71 AD3d 500 [2010]; SSBSS Realty Corp. v Public Serv. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 1:59 pm
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Allegheny Ludlum Corp.), the situation is much different after the 500-week period expires. [read post]
23 May 2012, 5:49 am
in a district court of the United States . . . in a judicial district . . . through which the defendant carrier operates”, or, when suing the carrier alleged to have caused the damage, “in the judicial district in which such loss or damage is alleged to have occurred”. [read post]
27 Jan 2023, 11:00 am
Corp., 398 Ill. [read post]
7 May 2012, 6:00 am
ITT Corp, 45 BRBS 17 (2011) concluding that a subsequent DBA carrier, when found liable for an aggravation, is liable for the entirety of Claimant’s attorneys fees under Section 28(a) when the subsequent carrier did not pay benefits within thirty (30) days of the Claimant’s filing a claim for compensation against the subsequent carrier. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:17 am
Globalive Wireless Management Corp. v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:17 am
Globalive Wireless Management Corp. v. [read post]
