Search for: "COX V STATE"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,203
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2019, 9:21 am
State v. [read post]
17 Mar 2014, 4:34 am
Cox v Ergo Versicherung AG (formerly known as Victoria), heard 20 – 21 January 2014. [read post]
6 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
"The case is Cox v. [read post]
20 Jun 2014, 7:43 am
Defense in a recent trip-and-fall premises liability lawsuit argued a defect in a doorway that reportedly caused a patron to trip was not unreasonably dangerous, and further pointed to a so-called "categorical exemption" regarding entryway thresholds under state law. [read post]
1 May 2013, 7:29 am
(Photo credit: Wikipedia)The alleged altering and commercial exploitation of a nine-year-old photo of a then-teen with Down Syndrome that went viral on the Internet prompted the 26-year-old man and his parents last week to file an $18 million suit in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee, according to reports by the Associated Press and the NashvilleCityPaper.com Web site.Holland et al. v. [read post]
6 Nov 2018, 11:12 am
Under Tennessee law, allegations in family law cases that are "tantamount to alleging dependency and neglect" have to be handled through particular procedures; in Friday's Cox v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 5:41 am
Veterans Land Board of the State of Texas (VLB), et al., No. 09? [read post]
6 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
” Blum v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 2:11 pm
After its recent opinion in State v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
22 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
City of New York, 779 F.3d 167, [quoting Cox v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:32 am
Cox & Jerome C. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 12:32 am
Cox & Jerome C. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Lord Carlile and others v Secretary of State for the Home Department – read judgment The High Court has upheld an order by the Home Secretary preventing Maryam Rajavi, a prominent Iranian dissident, from speaking in Parliament. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
Cox (that was summarily affirmed by the Supreme Court) seemed to eliminate a safe harbor previously thought to have been granted to state legislators under one person, one vote. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
10 Nov 2022, 6:20 am
In Schultz v. [read post]
11 Jan 2024, 12:15 am
See Davis & Cox v. [read post]