Search for: "California Service Employees Health " Results 421 - 440 of 3,451
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2007, 8:09 am
The drivers also did not receive vacation, sick leave, bonuses or health insurance from Sonic. [read post]
3 Apr 2007, 4:58 pm
However, the California Family Rights Act (CFRA) expressly excludes an employee's incapacity due to pregnancy, childbirth or related medical condition from the definition of "serious health condition. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:08 am
Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, it was required to conduct judicial review sufficient to protect plaintiff’s unwaivable statutory rights arising from his FEHA claims. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 3:15 am by Angela Mauroni
The measures were not circulated for public comment “[d]ue to the incredible speed with which the COVID-19 pandemic has spread and the urgent need to provide courts with the tools necessary to keep providing necessary services, while protecting the health and safety of the public and those who interact with the courts. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 4:01 pm by Wesley Shelton
In an effort to protect their employees, and the public, some health care and service industry employers, among others, have implemented mandatory flu shot programs. [read post]
California recently enacted an employee recall law that may substantially affect employers in the tourism and travel industries amid the emerging post-Covid-19 economy. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
Through its Reproductive Freedom, Accountability, Comprehensive Care, and Transparency Act (the FACT Act), the state legislature sought to ensure that “[a]ll California women, regardless of income, . . . have access to reproductive health services. [read post]
30 Sep 2017, 6:24 am by Nassiri Law
California employees whose rights are violated can take legal action against their employers. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 7:00 am
Many dentists and doctors start their own practice ready to provide health services to their patients but are unprepared for the complexities of the business side of a practice. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 3:21 pm by Nassiri Law
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, alleges that a health care company – one of the biggest providers of occupational health services in the country – unlawfully required applicants to to answer “highly intrusive, non-job-related and discriminatory” questions about their health. [read post]
On the evening of March 19, 2020, the Governor of California issued an order which requires all individuals living in the State to stay home or in their place of residence, except as needed to maintain continuity of operations of the federal critical infrastructure sectors, which include the financial services industry. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:30 am
Investigators uncovered claims made to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. [read post]
24 Jun 2011, 6:30 am by Robert David Malove
Investigators uncovered claims made to the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program. [read post]
27 Jul 2020, 10:04 am by Jessica Mulholland
The post California Releases ‘Employer Playbook for a Safe Reopening’ appeared first on HRWatchdog by Jessica Mulholland. [read post]
7 Sep 2020, 8:23 pm by Richard Reibstein Esq.
Dynamex itself changed settled law in California that had been based on a test issued by that same court nearly 30 years earlier in a case called Borello, which considered all factors relevant to the classification of workers as either independent contractors or employees. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:07 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Stamer is recognized, internationally, nationally and locally for her more than 24 years of work, advocacy, education and publications on leading health and managed care, employee benefit, human resources and related workforce, insurance and financial services, and health care matters. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 5:52 am by Joseph J. Lazzarotti
Note, however, that this obligation does not apply to providers of health care, health care service plans, or contractors regulated by the Confidentiality of Medical Information Act. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 11:51 am
Hayward’s Living Wage Ordinance was enacted in 1999 for the purpose of providing sufficient compensation so employees could “afford a decent standard of living in Hayward,” id., at 3 (italics added), and “requires covered contractors to pay their employees at least $8.00 per hour if health benefits are provided, or $9.25 per hour if no health benefits are provided,” id. [read post]