Search for: "California v. Arizona" Results 421 - 440 of 2,113
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jan 2020, 7:40 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit egregiously failed to apply clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jan 2020, 6:23 am by Brett Holubeck
  Arizona (Arizona Hospital Worker Minimum Wage and Insurance Regulations Initiative), Idaho (Idaho Minimum Wage Increase Initiative), and Missouri (Missouri Prohibit State Preemption of Local Minimum Wage and Benefits Laws Initiative) also have potential ballot measures related to the minimum wage next year. [read post]
14 Jan 2020, 9:07 am by John Elwood
Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit egregiously failed to apply clearly established federal law as determined by the Supreme Court in Arizona v. [read post]
10 Jan 2020, 1:49 pm
  Turns out that Villarreal also got a "DUI/DRUG" conviction in Arizona previously, so when he gets his California license back in 2015, Arizona reports the prior conviction, and pursuant to the automated system in California, that out-of-state conviction resulted in the computer spitting out an additional two-year suspension.Villarreal doesn't like that, so challenges the new suspension. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Jan 2020, 2:52 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s March 2018 entry of its opinion in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2019, 12:15 pm by Ronald Collins
In the 20th volume, Erwin Chemerinsky, dean of the University of California, Berkeley School of Law, and Howard Gillman, chancellor of the University of California, Irvine, have written “The Religion Clauses: The Case for Separating Church and State,” which focuses on what the authors see as the troubling directions our conservative justices are now taking insofar as they reject the idea of a wall separating church and state. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 6:13 am by ilpc
On October 1, 2019, plaintiffs in Brackeen v. [read post]