Search for: "California v. Austin" Results 421 - 440 of 637
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Aug 2012, 1:12 pm by Susan Brenner
  The opinion explains that in 2003, Steven Cohen owned a 1967 Austin Healey (1967 Healey) he decided to sell. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 3:04 pm by Christopher Danzig
[Threat Level / Wired] * Jurors in Apple v. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
  Of note, the University of California (UC) president and chancellors, the state of California, the California Institute of Technology and a group of student organization at UC campuses are among at least 69 organizations that have filed amicus briefs in support of the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
22 Aug 2012, 6:01 am
  Of note, the University of California (UC) president and chancellors, the state of California, the California Institute of Technology and a group of student organization at UC campuses are among at least 69 organizations that have filed amicus briefs in support of the University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
21 Aug 2012, 6:44 am by Kiran Bhat
Looking ahead to this fall’s oral arguments in Fisher v. [read post]
16 Aug 2012, 6:18 am by Cormac Early
Coverage continues of the amicus briefs filed earlier this week in Fisher v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 6:43 am by Rachel Sachs
University of Texas at Austin, in which the Court will examine the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions decisions. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 6:56 am by Kiran Bhat
University of Texas at Austin. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 7:48 am by Steve Hall
And: Austin resident Bernadette Feazell filed a complaint with the California Association of Criminalities. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 10:00 am by Nat
The open letter below, from Ralph Nader, was read at the American Association of Justice annual convention in July. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 10:04 am by Josh Wright
Adler, Bernard Petrie Professor of Law and Business and Associate Dean for Information Systems and Technology, New York University School of Law Panel V. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am by Rob Robinson
It’s Transparent – http://bit.ly/LvMcn5 (Doug Austin) How Secure is Your Organization’s Data? [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 5:05 am by Susan Brenner
California, 413 U.S. 15 (1973), which held that obscene material is not protected by the 1st Amendment. [read post]
9 Jun 2012, 2:00 am
For the 2d panel, the Section on Constitutional Law welcomes proposals for a paper, to be posted on the AALS website and published in the Loyola Law Review, that reflects on "the legacy of" Regents of the University of California v. [read post]