Search for: "California v. Harris" Results 421 - 440 of 1,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 8:06 am by Kali Borkoski
Harris, was announced for a unanimous Court by Justice Kagan. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 12:35 pm by Stephen M. Fuerch
The answer correctly summarized the state of the law of mixed-motive defenses following the Supreme Court’s ruling in Harris v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:08 am by Robert Kreisman
Supreme Court cast doubt on the fees in another Illinois case, Harris v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:28 am
Verde Retirement LLC, a California limited liability company, Verde FX Nevada, LLC, a California limited liability company, Covenant Capital Partners, a California corporation, and Steven L. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:33 am
., a Delaware Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant v. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 1:00 pm by Clay Hodges
Meanwhile, in California Kamala Harris, Attorney General for California, also filed suit on behalf of California on May 25, 2016. [read post]
25 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Linda C. McClain
Senator, the former Attorney General of California, and the former head prosecutor for one of the country’s major cities. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 8:04 am by Lyle Denniston
It has been clear, since the Court’s ruling exactly one year ago in Harris v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 9:08 pm by Lyle Denniston
That critique reached a new peak in the 2014 decision in Harris v. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 9:33 am by Adam Schwartz
Harris, EFF teamed up with the ACLU of California to file a lawsuit challenging parts of Proposition 35. [read post]
16 Dec 2007, 4:02 am
" The state failed to offer any explanation of the purpose of the challenged rule.In Harris v. [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 2:01 am
Harris and his assignees.One has an "employer looking at employee email" issue:The controlling case in California is People v. [read post]
8 Nov 2013, 5:00 am by Steven Boranian
  Come to think of it, this holding sounds somewhat like yet another California opinion we read in law school, Greenman v. [read post]