Search for: "California v. John" Results 421 - 440 of 4,442
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jul 2008, 8:24 pm
California State Controller Controller John Chiang has declared that he will not implement Schwarzenegger's order, and several employee unions have threatened to file suit to invalidate the order. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:06 am by Scott Sagaria
A San Jose bankruptcy attorney reports on actor John Malkovich's debocle with Bernie Madoff In the case of Securities Investor Protection Corp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 7:15 pm by Thomas Hopson
California, holding (in a unanimous opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts) that “police generally may not without a warrant search digital information on the cellphone seized from an individual who has been arrested. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 3:34 pm by Christine Dowling
  Topics discussed include California's three-strikes law, originalism, and the appointments of Justice Sotomayor and Justice Kagan. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 11:00 am by Anthony Lake
California, 545 U.S. 162 (2005), that a State could not impose the burden on a defendant claiming a racially discriminatory striking of a juror pursuant to Batson v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 6:40 am
District Court for the Northern District of California 2015) (“Music Group Macao v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 5:11 am by Yishai Schwartz
But in an opinion by Judge John Koetl (sitting by designation from the Southern District of New York and joined by Circuit judges Pierre Leval and Christopher Droney), the Second Circuit has now vacated the judgment, holding that the litigation failed the Supreme Court’s test for personal jurisdiction developed in Daimler AG v. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 7:09 am by Nabiha Syed
” And at the Volokh Conspiracy, John Elwood focuses on “a couple of apparent relists” from yesterday. [read post]
15 May 2007, 3:00 pm
Interested Persons, Following is my formal statement on behalf of John Doe, the plaintiff/petitioner in Doe v. [read post]