Search for: "California v. Russell" Results 421 - 440 of 750
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2008, 9:07 am
(Disclosure: Howe & Russell co-represents the petitioner.) [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 3:27 am
The San Jose [California] Police Department has more than 1,300 sworn officers. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
California, 11-5796; Kwon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Almanza was in two meetings in September on catfish, one on Sept. 19 with Fitz Elder, from the Russell Group, and another on Sept. 20 with H.E. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 11:57 am by John Floyd
  In macabre detail, the Eighth Circuit issued a March 6, 2018 decision in Bucklew v. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Economist, Steven Mazie looks at Husted v. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 4:55 am by Amy Howe
 [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
23 Aug 2012, 6:24 am by Cormac Early
Over at the Crime and Consequences blog, Kent Scheidegger reports that California is seeking a modification of the prisoner release order upheld in Brown v. [read post]
7 Jan 2020, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
Supreme Court with briefs that they hope will help convince the justices to nix a California law targeting donors,” urging the court in 22 separate submissions to review Americans for Prosperity v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 11:15 am by John Elwood
Representative actions under California’s Private Attorneys General Act will be exempt from arbitration because the Court denied cert. in CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC v. [read post]
19 Apr 2017, 4:38 am by Edith Roberts
Another Monday argument was in California Public Employees’ Retirement System v. [read post]
5 Mar 2015, 6:00 am by Maureen Johnston
  Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]