Search for: "California v. Russell"
Results 421 - 440
of 750
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Apr 2014, 6:19 am
” [Disclosure: Kevin Russell of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in Riley v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:10 am
California, the Court upheld a traffic stop that was based on an anonymous tip and resulted in arrest. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 5:31 am
” At the National Review’s Bench Memos, Roger Clegg notes recent developments in California that, in his view, bolster the state’s case in Schuette v. [read post]
15 Apr 2014, 9:29 am
POM Wonderful v. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:30 pm
California Building Industry Assn. v. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 7:10 pm
Estate of Huston v. [read post]
4 Mar 2014, 4:39 am
The Court also heard oral arguments in Hall v. [read post]
27 Feb 2014, 6:21 am
In United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
[Disclosure: The law firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in both Walden v. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 11:00 am
California, a Fourth Amendment case on third-party consent. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 5:53 am
[Disclosure: Tom Goldstein of Goldstein & Russell, P.C., the publisher of this blog, argued Walden on behalf of the respondents; the firm's Kevin Russell was among the counsel to the petitioner in Fernandez.] [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 5:29 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:53 am
California – police authority under Fourth Amendment to search a smartphone taken from an individual at the time of arrest United States v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 5:35 am
And in the third decision of the day, Burrage v. [read post]
27 Jan 2014, 5:49 am
California and United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
California, 13-494, a capital case involving a Batson challenge arising out of a crime allegedly committed in California’s newest entrepreneurial hot spot. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
Wurie and Riley v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 5:08 am
In 2013 one employee fraud case did crack the Top Ten, so the record is now 49-1 (employer fraud v. employee fraud) over the past five years. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 5:21 am
California and United States v. [read post]
