Search for: "Call v. Superior Court" Results 421 - 440 of 4,338
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Jared Green
Superior Court Orders This issue has been litigated repeatedly starting in the early 1990s and several New Hampshire courts have found that non-party medical treaters must answer deposition questions that call for expert opinions. [read post]
2 Mar 2023, 11:50 am by Jared Green
Superior Court Orders This issue has been litigated repeatedly starting in the early 1990s and several New Hampshire courts have found that non-party medical treaters must answer deposition questions that call for expert opinions. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 11:25 am by Mark Ashton
Curiously, the Court takes on a ruling in 2008 by another panel of the Superior Court in Billhime v. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 7:25 am by Jean-Marc Leclerc
The issue recently arose in an Ontario Superior Court decision called Garacci v. [read post]
6 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
However, the Pennsylvania Superior Court utilized a different rationale than that voiced by the trial court in Rush to invalidate the regular use exclusion.The Superior Court in Rush noted that the plaintiff was injured in a car accident, he was legally entitled to recover from the underinsured tortfeasors, and Erie had never obtained a 75 Pa.C.S.A. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
  In a judgment handed down on 23 February 2015 ( [2015] ONSC 1175), the Ontario Superior Court of Justice held that the operators of a right wing message board were publishers of defamatory material concerning a left wing blogger. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 2:42 pm by Richard J. Simmons
The ability of hospitals to use meal period waivers was called into question by a 2015 Court of Appeal decision in Gerard v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 10:52 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Superior Court, a case addressing the legal standard for determining whether a worker should be classified as an independent contractor or an employee. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 7:24 pm
According to the San Francisco Chronicle, the state’s highest court ruled in People v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 11:24 am by Kirsten Mikadze
For matters tried in Provincial Court, the ceiling established by the Supreme Court is 18 months; for matters tried in Superior Court, the ceiling is 30 months. [read post]