Search for: "Case Opened in Error"
Results 421 - 440
of 8,016
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Aug 2007, 7:50 am
Valuable insight for both employers and employees into the law of wrongful dismissal can be derived from Martha McGachie's case: It is not open to an employee to simply refuse to obey a direction from a superior. [read post]
25 May 2013, 6:01 am
Our office is open until 8:30 p.m. on Wednesdays and Saturday from 9 a.m. to 1 p.m. for working folks. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:22 am
In this case, it will not prevent you from getting hit with a malpractice action. [read post]
5 Oct 2015, 9:53 am
The Athletics apparently have suffered from the opening of a new San Francisco Bay area stadium for the Giants. [read post]
31 Mar 2006, 12:53 pm
In this case, it was clear from the tender documents that the parties intended to initiate contractual relations the moment the tenders were opened. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 6:55 pm
In the absence of prejudicial error, the defendant’s conviction stood. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 5:06 am
Gamboa then shot him and had Kroger open the cash register. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:13 am
These errors [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 2:41 pm
Before this case, New Mexico used a three-part test announced in the 1980 case State v. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 8:51 am
It should be a case limited in its application; let's just hope that in trying to right one wrong, the Indiana Supreme Court has not opened the lid to a true Pandora's box. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 3:47 am
The chances of the Supreme Court accepting the case are a good bit higher because the new “open discovery” rules which went into effect this past July, unlike the previous version, mandates an exchange of reports. [read post]
9 Oct 2023, 4:09 pm
For this, we have the Michael Morton discovery act which ensures an open-file, proactive discovery policy in criminal cases. [read post]
2 Sep 2015, 9:05 pm
Study of Type I, Type II error finds FDA much too conservative in drug approval [Vahid Montazerhodjat and Andrew Lo via Tabarrok] Behind push to license/regulate personal trainers in Washington, DC and elsewhere: ACA opened spigot of publicly channeled wellness money [Aaron Davis/Washington Post via Tyler Cowen, Peter Suderman] “Medical lending”: financiers “invest in operations to remove pelvic implants, [reap] payouts when cases settle” [Alison… [read post]
2 May 2011, 3:18 am
That analysis did not betray any error of principle, and a finding that essentially different concepts had been involved was one which was open (and indeed proper) on the evidence. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 7:40 am
As always, these summaries will be added to Smith’s Criminal Case Compendium, a free and searchable database of case summaries from 2008 to present. [read post]
23 May 2011, 1:49 pm
Presumption of vindictiveness in this case arose, although record did not show that judge initiated plea negotiations, he advocated that def enter open plea by warning def of potential consequences of proceeding to trial and made remarks which evidenced departure from role of impartial arbiter by endorsing strength of State's case and telling def that he would "rue the day" he decided to exercise his constitutional right to a trial.Hart, 36 FLW 1033,… [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Many of these substances are restricted from open use specifically because of the dangers they present when used incorrectly. [read post]
8 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Not only does everyone save money on legal costs, and not only do both sides learn important information from each other during the course of the conversation, but this willingness to be open encourages medical staff to come forward to report errors, which means greater safety for patients.Listen to the story here--it's well worth the six minutes it takes to hear those involved describe just how invaluable talking to each other can be. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 9:23 pm
Look at what the actual data says: 98,000 people dead every year from preventable medical errors, at a cost of $29 billion. [read post]
22 Dec 2007, 7:32 am
The state nevertheless insists that no reversible error occurred in this case because defendant, by insisting that he knew nothing of the contents of the car, invited the state to disprove the assertion with evidence of his refusal. [read post]
