Search for: "Case v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue"
Results 421 - 440
of 748
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2014, 10:28 am
The Internal Revenue Service has set forth guidelines for giving funds within limits, and if the limits are exceeded, the gifts are reportable and possibly taxable. [read post]
9 May 2014, 9:29 am
Also note that Internal Revenue Code Section 7463(b) provides that summary opinions like the one in this case may not be treated as precedent for any other case. [read post]
7 May 2014, 5:55 pm
Bush in Bush v. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 10:51 am
In Johnson v. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 8:59 am
Sanofi-Synthelabo Canada Inc., [2008] 3 SCR 265 At the outset, it is appropriate to refer to the words of Judson J. for this Court in Commissioner of Patents v. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 7:35 am
Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Vol. 33, 2013). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 5:46 pm
Commissioner of Internal Revenue – Portland lawyer Larry Brant of Garvey Schubert Barer on his blog, Larry’s Tax Law Reminder or threat: an insurance company’s intimidation tactics – Seattle attorney Karen Koehler on her blog, The Velvet Hammer Is It Time to Appoint a Discovery Referee? [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 10:02 am
” He also mentioned the recent decision in SEC v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 7:36 pm
Circuits) that “trade or business” status under ERISA should be governed by a novel, multi-factor “investment plus-like” test rather than by this Court’s decisions defining “trade or business” status for purposes of Section 162(a) of the Internal Revenue Code; and (2) whether the First Circuit erred by holding, contrary to Whipple v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 4:00 am
However, he managed to win his fair share of the legal arguments and even appeared successfully before the Supreme Court [ed. note: Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 7:31 am
The case, Loving v. [read post]
7 Feb 2014, 8:41 am
Section 6663(a) of the Internal Revenue Code imposes a 75% penalty on any underpayment of tax that is due to fraud. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm
The case, Halbig et al v. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 6:03 pm
Powell, 379 U.S. 48, 57-58 (1964), to wit: (1) “the investigation will be conducted pursuant to a legitimate purpose”; (2) “the inquiry may be relevant to the purpose”; (3) “the information sought is not already within the Commissioner’s possession”; and (4) “the administrative steps required by the [Internal Revenue] Code have been followed. [read post]
10 Jan 2014, 5:11 am
See, Solomon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2013, 2:55 pm
But the Labor Commissioner held that the TAA contained no such exception. [read post]
8 Dec 2013, 5:30 am
GOOGLE … http://t.co/fYtvYiwpf8 -> Three key agenda items for Canada's next privacy commissioner http://t.co/Wp18Sxedqt -> Hebrew U to Pay $300K for Copyright Infringement http://t.co/A2tII4UMRx -> U.S. [read post]
6 Dec 2013, 11:00 am
What makes an appraisal “qualified,” says the Tax Court, is whether it provides sufficient information to enable the Internal Revenue Service to evaluate an appraiser’s methodology. [read post]
26 Nov 2013, 9:46 am
Commissioner (T.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Comm'r of Internal Revenue. [read post]
