Search for: "Case v. Shepherd"
Results 421 - 440
of 558
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Aug 2010, 9:17 am
Read on and find out......Kuvin v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 2:59 am
The WRBI has also used this shepherding technique with cougars, moose, big horn sheep, and wolves.Enter the government. [read post]
14 Aug 2010, 5:02 am
Sprigman: this is a specific v. general placebo issue. [read post]
3 Aug 2010, 6:58 am
Martin, Case No. 102,639 (March 26, 2010); Troy V. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 10:05 am
Because the crypt-keepers, I mean bunker-managers, have calibrated the precise wind, barometer and temperature readings, and at this very moment the very freshest judicial utterances are wafting their way north from the "cold neutrality of a [coffee-swilling] impartial [court]":The above language is taken from footnote two of Judge Shepherd's opinion in Arce v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:54 pm
In Shepherd Montessori Center Milan v. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 2:30 am
It has always been the case that an employee can prepare to compete, but the recent case of Shepherds Investments Ltd v Walters [2006] EWHC 836 suggests that might not be quite so straightforward now. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:19 am
Seems like it might be worth the Supreme's time, especially with all the cruise cases here in South Florida.Plus it already divided the 3d, which dealt with this issue last year in Leslie v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 11:49 am
In today’s cases (Fong v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 7:48 am
City of Chicago, which greatly expanded the statute of limitations for disparate impact discrimination claims, take a look at these blogs: Employees can sue over older policies – from Jay Shepherd’s Gruntled Employees U.S. [read post]
26 May 2010, 8:37 am
New Falls:Judge Shepherd gets a case of "lex loci contractus" (I hope there's a shot for that).Judge Cope, however, thinks an exception applies, and also uses the fancy phrase "in para materia. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
Although we wish it were otherwise, taxpayers don’t always win FLP cases. [read post]
24 May 2010, 5:26 am
Although we wish it were otherwise, taxpayers don’t always win FLP cases. [read post]
20 May 2010, 8:09 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
19 May 2010, 6:43 pm
Small v. [read post]
10 May 2010, 8:01 am
More on Baze v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 8:54 am
Ordinarily, we would agree with Bosem that cases centering on allegations of fraud are unsuitable for summary judgment, see Burton v. [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 9:24 am
Gerald Wells and Kevin Shepherd won in State v. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 6:30 am
Div. 1986) (“Until courts have exhausted means of performing their shepherding function which do not terminate or deeply affect the outcome of a case, they ought not to bar a litigant’s way to the courtroom. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 10:56 am
Judge Shepherd, nose firmly in hand, says it is:Because Quiroga did not and, as a matter of public policy in this State, cannot through an unsecured agreement, such as the contingent fee agreement in this case, enter into an enforceable contract to divest himself from the exemptions afforded him through Article X, section 4(a), see Chames v. [read post]
