Search for: "Catoe v. United States" Results 421 - 440 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 4:40 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on Monday’s decision in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 4:12 am by Edith Roberts
In Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 6:20 am by James Bickford
  At ACSBlog, Rick Hasen discusses United States v. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 2:35 pm
Carvin of Jones Day in Washington (30 minutes), for the United States will be Solicitor General Elena Kagan (20 minutes), and for the Board will be Jeffrey A. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Soil” [Lachlan Markay, Free Beacon] Inholders can be caught in maze of jurisdictional obstacles when attempting to challenge federal land takings, Nevada church deprived of former water use deserves a remedy [Ilya Shapiro, Cato on cert petition in Ministerio Roca Solida v. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 9:30 pm by Kali Borkoski
 In 2009, in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
27 Sep 2019, 2:58 am by Walter Olson
[Ilya Shapiro and Dennis Garcia on Cato merits brief in Supreme Court case of Espinosa v. [read post]
12 Jan 2020, 8:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States decision in the Cato Supreme Court Review discusses the potential difference between conservative jurisprudence and constitutionalist jurisprudence. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
16 Jul 2018, 11:16 am by Adam Feldman
The United States had one amicus brief this term with a composite score of over 90. [read post]
In United States v. 480.00 Acres of Land, No. 07-13584 (Feb. 11, 2009), the 11th Circuit held that in calculating compensation, the federal government could take advantage of the fact that the local government's restrictive land use regulations had severely depressed the value of the acquired property. [read post]
29 May 2012, 9:40 am by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-955Issue(s): Whether the McCormick v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 5:00 am by James Romoser
And amid all of that activity, the court heard oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:34 am by Dan Korobkin
As argued in the lawsuits, this practice violates the United States Constitution’s Fourth Amendment protections against unreasonable searches and seizures. [read post]