Search for: "Charles v. State" Results 421 - 440 of 4,853
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Mar 2022, 9:18 am by fjhinojosa
Camp’s article The Failure of Adversarial Process in the Administrative State is cited in §2:13 of the following practice series: Charles H. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
Rees decision and approved the use of midazolam in 2015 in Glossip v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The death on 3 March 2022 at the age of 79 was announced of Sir Charles Gray,  the former libel judge. [read post]
7 Feb 2022, 7:01 am by Jack Goldsmith, Oona Hathaway
United States as if it put to rest the serious First Amendment concerns prepublication review raises. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 3:59 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Although the complaint alleges that Devine and Neiman induced Allen to lend money beginning in 2000, the continuing wrong doctrine (see Selkirk v State of New York, 249 AD2d 818, 819; Barash v Estate of Sperlin, 271 AD2d 558) applies such that the six-year statute of limitations “began to run from the commission of the last wrongful act” (Community Network Serv., Inc. v Verizon NY, Inc., 39 AD3d 300, 301). [read post]
20 Jan 2022, 12:36 pm by Eugene Volokh
Sarah Eckhardt, decided last week by a Texas Special Court of Review (Chief Justice Brian Quinn, Justice Charles Kreger, and Justice W. [read post]
17 Jan 2022, 10:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Plaintiff Charles Slaughter alleges that the CON regime, including the moratoria, violates the equal protection and substantive due process clauses of the United States and Mississippi Constitutions. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 1:49 pm by William B. Gould IV
That’s the position of the states that are hostile to President Biden, and about half the states of the Union signed on to a brief challenging this rule. [read post]
2 Jan 2022, 8:17 am by Giorgio Luceri
TRADE MARKSLise Charles (WTR) provides an overview of the most-read posts on Word Trademark Review (WTR) on European trade mark case law over the past year, including analyses of cases dealing with issues such as unconventional signs (i.e., colour marks and 3D marks) (MHCS v EUIPO | Case T-274/20 and Guerlain v EUIPO | Case T-488/20), the risks of using a mark in a manner other than that registered (Fashioneast Sàrl v EUIPO | Case T-297/20) and taking… [read post]