Search for: "Clark v. Thomas" Results 421 - 440 of 568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm by Stephen Bilkis
Defendant's motion to preclude impeachment evidence, People v Sandoval 34 NY2d 371 (1974), and evidence-in-chief of prior bad acts, People v Ventimiglia 52 NY2d 350 (1981), is referred to the trial court for hearings immediately prior to trial. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 9:59 am by Dan Bushell
                 A different panel, consisting of Judges Thomas, Wetherell, and Swan, heard oral argument this morning in Graham v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Result: Vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of Montgomery, with Justice Sotomayor concurring and Justice Alito, joined by Justice Thomas, dissenting. [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am by Andrew Hamm
” Lastly, about Ortiz v. [read post]
20 Mar 2023, 2:56 am by INFORRM
On the same day, there were hearings in the cases of 2 Wakefield Limited v Persons Unknown, Clarke v Rose and Wolverhampton City Council v Kevin Poole. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 7:01 am by Randy E. Barnett
Stone, Sex and the Constitution (2017) Suja Thomas, The Missing American Jury (2016) Thomas G. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm by INFORRM
Thomas tweeted a copy of her court statement here. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 5:05 pm by Lyle Denniston
  A federal District judge in Atlanta, Thomas W. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
On 29 June 2023, judgment was handed down in R v Dent, 2023 ONCA 460. [read post]
4 Feb 2007, 11:59 pm
Clark Martin, who retired from Vinson & Elkins on Jan. 1, says among those planning to join Kelly Hart as Houston partners are two V&E partners who are close to that firm's mandatory retirement age of 67, and former Enron Corp. general counsel James V. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:09 am by New Books Script
K 4573 A6 F88 2012 The future of indirect taxation : recent trends in VAT and GST systems around the world edited by Thomas Ecker, Michael Lang, Ine Lejeune. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
“Miss Sharon Clark complained to the Press Complaints Commission that an article headlined “Dad dies trying to save daughter”, published in the Maidenhead Advertiser on 21 July 2011, included a photograph of her daughter without consent in breach of Clause 6 (Children) of the Editors’ Code of Practice. [read post]