Search for: "Clark v. United States"
Results 421 - 440
of 1,489
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2016, 10:00 pm
John Wiley & Sons, is a dispute over copyrighted textbooks produced overseas but imported to the United States and resold by Kirtsaeng without the publisher's permission. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Pannick QC says it is no answer for the Government to say that the long title to the 1972 Act “says nothing about withdrawal“. 16:04: Lord Pannick QC refers to the case of Robinson v Secretary of State for Northern Ireland, which he submits supports a “flexible response” to constitutional developments. [read post]
4 Nov 2023, 4:02 pm
The case could set up a major test for gun rights for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
7 May 2007, 1:12 am
United States, 458 F.3d 674, 677 (7th Cir.2006); Clark Equip. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 6:42 am
--Hamdi v. [read post]
17 Oct 2007, 12:24 pm
Sarah Stauffer Curtiss, The Ninth Circuit â [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 8:36 am
Khary Penebaker et al v. [read post]
1 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
Cummins, Clarks Summit firm Cummins Law. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 4:15 pm
I think the comment of Lord Kerr of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom in Rugby Football Union, … is apposite. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 6:51 am
We agree with the position of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals in United States v. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:29 pm
Terry Rogers and Clark C. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 12:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
20 Apr 2017, 2:00 am
The European Commission’s guidance on the Directive’s transposition and implementation states that family membership in the direct line “extends to adoptive relationships” and calls on member states to secure children’s best interests in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child 1989. [read post]
19 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm
See e.g., United States v. [read post]
Florida Supreme Court Holds Court Not Arbitrator Determines Whether Agreement Violates Public Policy
23 Nov 2011, 10:57 am
"; and "Finally, we conclude that the United States Supreme Court's recent decision in Rent-A-Center, West, Inc. v. [read post]
1 May 2017, 10:00 pm
With respect to this lawsuit, the band claims common law trademark rights in the HOTEL CALIFORNIA mark for the goods listed above and also cite a pending application to register the mark with the United State Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
14 Mar 2012, 8:52 am
Weinfeld of Parker, Milliken, Clark, O’Hara & Samuelian in Los Angeles. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 10:18 am
The appeal to the Supreme Court is due to be heard by Lord Phillips, Lord Walker, Lord Mance, Lord Collins and Lord Clarke. [read post]
1 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
Sawyer[2](The Steel Seizure Case), 343 U.S. 579 (1952)· United States v. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 12:19 pm
The standard for showing ineffective assistance of counsel rising to a level that violates a defendant's constitutional rights to such a degree that would require a defendant to obtain a new trial is set forth in the 1984 United States Supreme Court decision of Strickland v. [read post]
