Search for: "Coke v. State"
Results 421 - 440
of 474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Apr 2008, 11:35 pm
For example, we need to retire the example of a consumer ordering Coke and the retailer silently delivering Pepsi instead from trademark law. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:48 pm
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held in State of Connecticut v. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 4:59 am
This question was addressed in Revill v Newberry [1996] QB 567. [read post]
10 Sep 2016, 11:14 am
Tasting the TM in Pepsi/Coke studies.What we know about brands v. what we know about TMs—Deven Desai has written about the distinction and the lack thereof that has been part of the problem. [read post]
21 May 2023, 12:28 pm
United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:03 am
Way to deal with specimen laundering, as in LTTB and in Ohio State’s THE. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 11:23 am
See Eldred v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
LTTB v. [read post]
11 Dec 2008, 7:48 am
Gordon and Tracy V. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (Spicy IP), Latin America: Merck Serono signs distribution agreement with Bristol-Myers Squibb for portfolio of established pharmaceutical brands in Latin America: (IP tango), US: Biotech industry growth to slow due to funding pressures and competition from biosimilars: (Managing Intellectual Property), US: House Commerce Committee posts responses to its questions on biogenerics; not surprisingly, the views run the gamut: (FDA Law Blog), US: Biosimilar debate heats up at BIO: (Managing… [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
– Gene Johnson, The Seattle Times, January 26, 2010 Washington state will do more to prevent polluted stormwater from running off state highways into rivers, lakes and Puget Sound. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am
Introduction: Robert Burrell Australia/NZ is probably unusual b/c abandonment plays 3 distinct roles: (1) not a purely rhetorical device. 1863 case: from the moment you first use a TM, you have a property right—no goodwill, no reputation required. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 9:49 am
V, dated 14th July, 1923, page 260)30. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:36 am
You can’t do drugs, but you can drink a lot of Coke. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
This is especially helpful because the legal and colloquial definitions of monopoly differ throughout history — the term means something different under the current Sherman Antitrust Act, to someone during the era of trust-busting in early 20th century United States, and to a jurist in 18th century England. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 4:19 pm
State agencies, including those in Arkansas, Colorado, Louisiana, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma and Texas, have all reported to the U.S. [read post]
6 Sep 2018, 8:31 am
The Daily Sketch, 11th December 1913, covering the appeal of Bebb v The Law Society. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 3:27 am
The plea gets its name from 1970’s North Carolina v. [read post]
