Search for: "Corporal Barnes"
Results 421 - 440
of 831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2011, 3:12 pm
This simply means that if a corporation or person is a party suing on a contract, but their names are not on the contract---they need to show evidence that the rights and interests were transferred to them, or "assigned". [read post]
9 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Primary materials are posted on the DU Corporate Governance web site. [read post]
29 Mar 2007, 10:00 pm
"First, the presence of marijuana growing in the corral does nothing to show the presence of cut marijuana in the barn. [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 11:01 am
Only a few books I can find on the subject of rendering services to customers in the business sections of Borders or Barnes & Noble ever mention the question. [read post]
28 May 2017, 4:37 am
Chapter XVIII (“Of Corporations”)Book II (Of the Rights of Things)6. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 10:03 pm
Barn environments were pervasively contaminated, with 63 percent of laying hen house contaminated with Salmonella enteritidis. [read post]
23 Feb 2017, 4:19 am
In Life Technologies Corporation v. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 9:05 pm
Even though business laws, including corporate and securities laws, have been heavily influenced in the last several decades by what can fairly be called an ideology of profit maximization, much of the law has in practice withstood efforts to reduce business law’s prescriptions to this single objective.[2] In the American Law Institute’s Principles of Corporate Governance, for example, the objective of business corporations to act “with a view to… [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:05 am
FoxNews covers the creation of the new group here and here, while Robert Barnes and Dan Eggen of the Washington Post discuss Mrs. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am
Writing for this blog, Lyle Denniston reports that “a majority of the Justices looked notably unconvinced” that corporations could be sued in U.S. courts for human rights violations perpetrated abroad; similar observations were made by Mike Sacks at the Huffington Post, Robert Barnes at the Washington Post, Marcia Coyle at the National Law Journal, David G. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 4:57 am
Van Boekel was fined $5,000 and Van Boekel Holdings Inc. was fined $25,000 - between April 21, 2007 and April 30, 2007, in the Township of East Zorra-Tavistock, did commit the offence of discharging pig manure onto landadjacent to a barn and then into the Thames River, which impaired or may have impaired the quality of the water, contrary to Section 30 (1) of the OWRA. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
And in a post published at the Huffington Post before the reargument order was issued, Katie Redford responded to post-argument news reports suggesting that the Court was likely to rule in favor of corporations. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 3:02 am
For us, the chapter entitled "TRIPs-Plus Provisions in FTAs: Recent Trends", by Bryan Mercurio (Senior Lecturer in the Faculty of Law, New South Wales) is probably the most accessible chapter, along with that which follows it ("Competition Law in Regional Trade Agreements: an Overview", by University of Dundee academics Melaku Geboye Desta and Naomi Julia Barnes). [read post]
12 Feb 2009, 10:56 pm
In the meantime though all of you in the supply chain are still subject to the lead limits (testing or not) and if and until Congress acts the Sword of Damocles will remain over your heads.Here are the petitions and the respective letter responses (by the way the letters from the CPSC are all dated February 9, 2009 but this information was not posted by CPSC until late on February 12, 2009):Bicycle Product Suppliers Association (BPSA) (January 28, 2009) and Response from CPSC General Counsel… [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 6:59 am
.'" Bob Barnes of the Washington Post also takes note of her exchange with Wolf Blitzer about the Court's decision in Bush v. [read post]
3 Oct 2018, 3:48 am
” Additional coverage comes from Robert Barnes for The Washington Post, Andrew Chung at Reuters, and Richard Wolf at USA Today. [read post]
29 Oct 2007, 4:46 am
The Scheduled Panel Members are: Judges Kirsch, Robb and Barnes. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 1:57 pm
Sept. 26, 2006) (minute order); Barnes v. [read post]
16 Jun 2012, 8:14 am
To Professor Smith the truly radical aspect of CU is the idea, endorsed by four justices, that the participation of a corporation in the production or distribution of a movie or other form of communication is enough to allow the federal government to prohibit or limit it, whether that corporation is CU, Barnes & Noble, or Dreamworks. [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 3:55 am
“The determination whether a corporation should be dissolved is within the discretion of the [trial] court” (Matter of Cellino v Cellino & Barnes, P.C., 175 AD3d 1120, 1121 [4th Dept 2019]; see Business Corporation Law § 1111 [a]). [read post]
