Search for: "Corporations A, B, and C" Results 421 - 440 of 7,235
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 May 2023, 3:34 pm
 Pix Credit: Marble Relief (2 Pair of Collared Slaves led by helmeted men perhaps to fight like the animals below; Izmir (Smyrna) c AD 200 (University of Oxford Collection Sometimes the most intriguing legal developments in the liberal democratic camp come from its most active flanks. [read post]
30 May 2023, 10:53 am by Greg Lambert and Marlene Gebauer
We talk with ⁠Michael Bommarito⁠, CEO of 273 Ventures and well-known innovator and thinker in legal technology and education. [read post]
29 May 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
How Retirement Plans Can Correct Minimum Distribution Errors Discover the solutions available when qualified or 403(b) plans miss or miscalculate required minimum distributions. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am by Rebecca M. Guidry
Sabine River Auth., State of Louisiana, No. 20-40138 c/w No. 22-40433 (5th Cir. 2023). [read post]
26 May 2023, 7:13 am by David J. Clark
(b) “Employer” means any individual, partnership, association, corporation, business,trust, or any person or group of persons acting directly or indirectly in the interest of anemployer in relation to an employee. [read post]
24 May 2023, 7:18 am by David
§ 42.51(b)(1)(iii) A decade or so ago I was speaking at the Office and pointed out that the word “party” in 42.11(a) is ridiculously broad as is including inventors and corporate officers in 42.51(b)(iii) since it is not limited to those inventors and corporate officers who are at least involved in the proceeding (do you really have to call Tim Cook to see if he knows something when Apple is in an IPR? [read post]
” As laid out in Section  3729(b)(1), the FCA’s standard for scienter only allows liability when fraud occurs with actual knowledge; deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information, or; reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. [read post]
18 May 2023, 8:30 pm by Ann Pearson
 I think that we should handle it by doing X, Y, Z, or, you know, A, B, C. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:16 am by Andrew Fink, Matthew Johnston
They are an entirely new type of corporate entity—Russian lawfare against sanctions. [read post]
17 May 2023, 1:27 pm by Jacob Tingen
The Ultimate Business Owner's Handbook: Legal Strategies for Success from a Business Lawyer By Jacob Tingen May 17, 2023 Business & IP Welcome to the Ultimate Business Owner’s Handbook: Legal Strategies for… [read post]
17 May 2023, 6:20 am by Kevin LaCroix
What is the new corporate offence of failure to prevent fraud and what are the sanctions? [read post]
17 May 2023, 2:29 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
HMRC observe that the word “tunnel” appears not only in section 22 List B of the Act, but also in section 23 List C. [read post]
16 May 2023, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan and Michael C. Dorf
”How about agribusiness subsidies, corporate welfare, public spending on overpriced pharmaceuticals—or congressional salaries? [read post]
16 May 2023, 5:58 am by Fionnuala Ní Aoláin
  So, the regulatory framework should: (a) be international in nature (either by way of treaty or by way of relatively consistent adoption by a large number of States); (b) depend on State obligations as a means of regulating corporate behaviour; (c) be limited to the spyware field; (d) entail compulsory and concrete action on the part of States; (e) impose actual liabilities upon private entities developing spyware to undertake due diligence showing there is no real… [read post]
14 May 2023, 6:56 pm
 Pix Credit Audience Chamber Piazza della Signoria Apartments of the Priors c. 1543 In the United States at least, there has been an increasing worry about the state of U.S. relations (economic and political) with Latin American states. [read post]
12 May 2023, 1:15 pm by Greg Lambert
This has a multitude of effects ranging from flooding courts with more and more cases, to overwhelming defense firms and corporations with a much higher litigation matters, to making working at plaintiff’s firms more attractive to associates who don’t want to work the number of hours they would need to do in BigLaw firms. [read post]