Search for: "Counsels and Agents of Defendants" Results 421 - 440 of 3,469
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2024, 3:58 am by jonathanturley
But that condition would clearly prohibit further statements deceptively claiming that the agents involved in the execution of the search warrant were engaged in an effort to kill him, his family, or Secret Service agents. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 1:19 pm by Michael Lumer
Because counsel has not discussed the second case, nor requested the carve out, it's not in the release.In June 2013, plaintiff's counsel lets his client execute the above. [read post]
15 Feb 2018, 1:54 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Defendants and their counsel adamantly defended misleading representations that Monahan and GhostBed had no meaningful association and that Monahan was a consumer journalist entitled to the fullest possible protection of the First Amendment,” resulting in a full day evidentiary hearing to determine the truth. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 12:12 pm
” The court also held that the MCCs’ responsive records and ESI were in the possession, custody and control of defendants, that the MCCs were agents of the defendants, and that the MCCs’ contracts with the defendants required the MCCs to make available their responsive records. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 2:25 pm by John C. Manoog III
Please remember that there is a time limit for filing negligence claims in the state of Massachusetts, so it is important to talk to counsel as soon as possible. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 10:03 am
Liebman, 303 N.Y. 88 (1951) (plaintiff attorney sued defendant author, because defendant refused to pay plaintiff commissions agreed upon in contract, arguing contract by which defendant employed plaintiff to represent him as personal manager was void because plaintiff was not licensed as talent agent under NY law). [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 8:18 am by Katie
Grant, JudgeRepresenting Appellant (Defendant): Diane Lozano, State Public Defender, PDP; Tina Kerin, Appellate Counsel; Eric M. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:30 am by Nora Ellingsen
Prior to the law enforcement interview, the FBI agents advised Khatallah of his Miranda rights, and read him an additional statement distinguishing themselves from his prior interview team, telling the defendant that they were “starting anew. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:54 pm
Indianapolis, Indiana - In conjunction with co-counsel, an Indiana patent attorney for Eli Lilly of Indianapolis, Indiana prevailed in the Southern District of Indiana on claims of patent infringement. [read post]
10 Nov 2012, 7:19 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
North American defended the case on the grounds that there was no principal-agent relationship between it and the investigation firm. [read post]
28 Jan 2010, 12:50 pm
" Fortunately for the defendant, the plaintiff also deposed the President of defendant's Board of Directors who was more knowledgable and defense counsel asked to treat his testimony as that of a corporate representative. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:00 am by jonathanturley
In this case, the potential defendant not only incriminated himself under the law, but his associates and family, as well. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 4:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Woe unto the corporate counsel who gets caught in the crossfire of a nasty shareholder dispute. [read post]
16 Jan 2023, 6:55 pm by Law Lady
., Appellee. 2nd District.Contracts -- Corporations -- Buyout clause -- Enforcement -- Standing -- Equal protection -- Appeals -- No error in requiring defendant shareholder to sell all her stock in corporation to other remaining shareholder pursuant to buyout clause of shareholder agreement after defendant's husband, who was also a shareholder, passed away -- No error in determining that plaintiff had standing to sue for specific performance as corporation's authorized… [read post]
14 Mar 2015, 5:00 pm
The one notable exception is inefficient legal counsel, but that's often very difficult to prove. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 3:06 pm by Tilem & Associates
The defendant argued that the search was unlawful pursuant to a prior case because the search was conducted purely as a result of the defendant’s status as a parolee and that such a search can only be performed by the defendant’s parole agent, rather than detectives. [read post]
Noreika also dismissed this argument, writing: Defendant thus ignores the substantial degree of independence that Special Counsel Weiss has notwithstanding that he remains subject to the DOJ regulations. [read post]